© Jirameth Potib | Dreamstime.com
Dreamstime M 125878507 620bd732837d7

NEC: Has Your Busway Left the Station?

Feb. 15, 2022
Physical damage, corrosive vapors, wet locations and hoistways are problems for busway installations.

Busway has many advantages over a conductor-and-raceway system. One advantage is the large cross-sectional area, which  means much lower circuit impedance, leading to better performance and longer lifespan. Due to how it’s connected together, busway is relatively simple to install, change, and add onto. Lifetime cost is lower than with the raceway-and-conductor method.

You can install it through walls and through floors [368.10]. If it is of totally enclosed, nonventilating construction, you can even run it behind access panels (but you have to make the joints between sections and fittings accessible for maintenance).

So why isn’t busway used for all service, feeder, and branch circuits? Several reasons:

  • It can’t be subject to severe physical damage [368.12]. One solution could be to install it as a backbone along the ceiling or up in the rafter structure, where it is protected. But you would then need to get through the dangerous area with tubing or conduit suited to the hazards.
  • It can’t be subjected to corrosive vapors. The typical solution is to use a raceway that is made from a corrosion-resistant material (e.g., rigid PVC conduit, Article 352) or PVC-coated rigid metallic conduit (often seen in applications such as refineries).
  • You can’t install it in hazardous locations or wet locations because of its “open” construction [368.12(C) and (D)].
  • You can’t install it in hoistways or less than 8 ft above the floor of a working platform [368.12(B) and (E)]. You can break the working platform rule if the particular busway you are using is provided with an identified cover.

The decision on which wiring method is optimal for a given application in a given environment under specific conditions of use is can be difficult to get right. The factors just mentioned may also have to be balanced against cost, time, aesthetics, future uses, craft skill at installation, maintenance concerns, efficiency, circuit density in the run(s), and materials availability. Busway often comes out ahead in this calculus, but only for applications for which it is not prohibited by 368.10.

About the Author

Mark Lamendola

Mark is an expert in maintenance management, having racked up an impressive track record during his time working in the field. He also has extensive knowledge of, and practical expertise with, the National Electrical Code (NEC). Through his consulting business, he provides articles and training materials on electrical topics, specializing in making difficult subjects easy to understand and focusing on the practical aspects of electrical work.

Prior to starting his own business, Mark served as the Technical Editor on EC&M for six years, worked three years in nuclear maintenance, six years as a contract project engineer/project manager, three years as a systems engineer, and three years in plant maintenance management.

Mark earned an AAS degree from Rock Valley College, a BSEET from Columbia Pacific University, and an MBA from Lake Erie College. He’s also completed several related certifications over the years and even was formerly licensed as a Master Electrician. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and past Chairman of the Kansas City Chapters of both the IEEE and the IEEE Computer Society. Mark also served as the program director for, a board member of, and webmaster of, the Midwest Chapter of the 7x24 Exchange. He has also held memberships with the following organizations: NETA, NFPA, International Association of Webmasters, and Institute of Certified Professional Managers.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations