Image

Illustrated Catastrophes: Molten Metal Mess

Oct. 16, 2015
More Code catastrophes uncovered and corrected in these faulty installations

All references are based on the 2014 edition of the NEC.

Molten Metal Mess

These photos demonstrate the damage that can occur when ground fault current causes loose connections to arc and spark. Thankfully, there was no damage to the structure from the arcing in this particular situation. Can you imagine what could have happened if this problem had never been found and repaired? It could have been a disaster for the residents living in this building. All of this could have been avoided if the installer had simply tightened the locknut.

In addition to creating a dangerous situation, this loose locknut created a violation of Sec. 250.4(A)(3), since the metal cabinet and raceway were not connected together in a manner that established an effective ground fault current path. Similarly, Sec. 300.10 requires metal raceways, cable armor, boxes, fittings, and metal enclosures to be connected together in a manner that provides “effective electrical continuity.” The photos clearly indicate that effective electrical continuity was lacking for this installation.

The arcing at this locknut connection was so bad that it “welded” the locknut to the offset nipple, and we were unable to remove it. In fact, we pulled the wires out and replaced the entire cabinet due to the extensive damage caused from the arcing.

In Need of a Cover Up

The use of a plaster ring on this box may not have been the best choice of equipment for this installation. This could be a violation of Sec. 110.3(B) if this plaster ring is not designed to be exposed on the surface like this. The use of an exposed work cover may have been the better option here.

The lack of a faceplate on the receptacle is a violation of Sec. 406.6. Receptacle faceplates must be installed to completely cover the opening. The opening around this receptacle is so big that you can see the wires inside the box, and it also leaves the energized receptacle terminals exposed enough to make accidental contact. According to Sec. 110.27(A), live parts operating at 50V or more must be guarded against accidental contact. A person’s fingers could easily come in contact with the terminals on this receptacle, making it a real shock hazard.

The next problem I see is the missing knockout seal on the left side of the box. According to Sec. 110.12(A), unused openings like this must be closed up to afford protection equivalent to the wall of the enclosure itself. Arcs or sparks could easily escape through all of these large openings and ignite nearby combustible materials.

About the Author

Russ LeBlanc | Owner

Russ started in the electrical trade as an apprentice in 1985. He worked his way up to become a Journeyman Electrician and then eventually became a Master Electrician and Licensed Construction Supervisor. In 1999 Russ become an Electrical Instructor for The Peterson School of Engineering in Massachusetts where he developed his passion for teaching, and quickly became Department Head of Electrical Instruction. Russ has taught thousands of apprentices, electricians, engineers, inspectors, and other electrical professionals during his career as an instructor. He continues to provide electrical professionals with Electrical Code seminars, Arc-Flash Awareness training seminars and educational material through his LeBlanc Consulting Services in North Reading, MA whose specialty is educating electricians. He has been an active member of the NFPA Electrical Section and has authored hundreds of National Electrical Code proposals and comments which have become Code rules to improve the safety for the electrical industry. Russ is also an IAEI certified Electrical Inspector.

Please visit www.russleblanc.net for more information.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations