Practically Speaking 619d11b4b2bb7

Practically Speaking: Triggered by Definitions

Dec. 1, 2021
Why Sec. 406.4(D)(4) may undergo more changes in the near future

Section 406.4(D)(4) of the 2020 National Electrical Code (NEC) is a prime example of why understanding the definitions in Art. 100 is of the utmost importance when it comes to deciphering and applying the rules of the Code.

The definition of “receptacle outlet” in Art. 100 is “an outlet where one or more receptacles are installed.” A good example of this would be a duplex receptacle in an outlet box. In contrast, the Art. 100 definition of “receptacle” states in part that a receptacle is “a contact device installed at the outlet for the connection of an attachment plug, or for the direct connection of electrical utilization equipment designed to mate with the corresponding contact device.” Understanding the difference between a receptacle and a receptacle outlet is needed to help understand the AFCI protection requirements specified in Sec. 406.4(D)(4). This Section has undergone several changes over the past few Code revision cycles, and I expect more changes will be coming soon.

Presently, the literal wording in Sec. 406.4(D)(4) triggers AFCI protection requirements when a receptacle outlet located in any area specified for dwelling units [Sec. 210.12(A)], dormitory units [Sec. 210.12(B)], or guest rooms, guest suites, and patient sleeping rooms in nursing homes and limited-care facilities in [Sec. 210.12(C)] is replaced but does not trigger AFCI protection requirements where only the receptacle itself is replaced. Do you think that is the intent of this rule?

Based on the previous wording of Sec. 406.4(D)(4) in the 2017 Code and the revisions made in the First Draft Report based on Public Input that was submitted for the 2023 edition, I believe the intent of the present wording in Sec. 406.4(D)(4) was to trigger the AFCI protection requirements even when performing a simple receptacle replacement. However, the literal wording does not quite get there, since it only applies where a receptacle outlet is replaced. While receptacle outlet boxes are sometimes replaced, I think replacing the outlet box is a much less likely occurrence than replacing only the receptacle.

Perhaps the 2023 Code will provide some much-needed clarity on the intent of these rules, but until that time comes, we will need to continue to do our best for keeping our customers safe and to have professional and productive conversations with our AHJ to make sense of these sometimes confusing rules.

About the Author

Russ LeBlanc | Owner

Russ started in the electrical trade as an apprentice in 1985. He worked his way up to become a Journeyman Electrician and then eventually became a Master Electrician and Licensed Construction Supervisor. In 1999 Russ become an Electrical Instructor for The Peterson School of Engineering in Massachusetts where he developed his passion for teaching, and quickly became Department Head of Electrical Instruction. Russ has taught thousands of apprentices, electricians, engineers, inspectors, and other electrical professionals during his career as an instructor. He continues to provide electrical professionals with Electrical Code seminars, Arc-Flash Awareness training seminars and educational material through his LeBlanc Consulting Services in North Reading, MA whose specialty is educating electricians. He has been an active member of the NFPA Electrical Section and has authored hundreds of National Electrical Code proposals and comments which have become Code rules to improve the safety for the electrical industry. Russ is also an IAEI certified Electrical Inspector.

Please visit www.russleblanc.net for more information.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations