locked out breaker

Is a De-Energized Circuit Safe?

Feb. 20, 2019
The answer to this seemingly simple question is "not necessarily."

In “Family Feud” TV gameshow fashion, if we asked the general public, “What is the best way to protect yourself from electricity?” the number one answer would be: “Turn it off.” Even within the electrical industry, the answer typically is the same — turn off the power.

It seems that almost every initial safety audit results in finding someone working on something de-energized with the assumption that it is safe because “I opened that disconnect switch right over there, so I know it is de-energized.” However, for conductors to truly be safe, there are more steps to follow than just simply turning off the power.

Section 120.2(A) of NFPA 70E-2018 states “Electrical conductors and circuit parts shall not be considered to be in an electrically safe work condition until all of the applicable requirements of Article 120 have been met.”

Per Sec. 120.5, an Electrically Safe Work Condition is established through an eight-step process:

1.    Identify all potential sources of electrical energy.

2.    Open disconnecting devices for all potential electrical sources.

3.    Whenever possible, visually verify the disconnect devices are open.

4.    Release stored electrical energy.

5.    Release or block stored mechanical energy.

6.    Apply lockout/tagout (LOTO) devices.

7.    Verify absence of voltage on all phases using the live-dead-live method.

8.    When applicable, apply appropriately rated personal protective grounds.

If any of the eight steps that are applicable are not complete, then the circuit or circuit part is not in an electrically safe work condition and should be treated as an energized conductor. Therefore, de-energized does not necessarily mean that the conductor is safe; an electrically safe work condition must be established.

Northcott is a professional engineer licensed in the state of Tennessee and a senior power engineer with Jacobs Technology, Inc., in Tullahoma, Tenn. He is also an NFPA 70E compliance subject matter expert, a principle member of the NFPA 70B Committee, electrical safety trainer, certified maintenance and reliability professional, and certified reliability leader. He can be reached at [email protected].

Over the last several years, I have been blessed with the opportunity to visit many commercial, industrial, and government facilities across the United States to provide electrical safety training and audits. During that time, I have come to realize that there are several common misunderstandings or misapplications that must be addressed regardless of the type or location of the facility. This “Safety Sense” department will address these issues in a short format, addressing frequently asked questions. If there are topics you would like covered, please email me at [email protected].

About the Author

Tommy Northcott | Senior Power Engineer

Northcott earned a BS Degree in Electrical Engineering with an emphasis in Power Systems from Tennessee Technological University. He is a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Tennessee, a Certified Reliability Leader, and a Certified Maintenance and Reliability Professional and is a current principle member on the NFPA 70B committee (Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance). Tommy has broad experience working with large electric utility systems as a Systems Engineer, Arc Flash Program Manager, Operations and Maintenance Manager, and Reliability Engineering Manager. Tommy has extensive experience in operations and maintenance of electrical equipment, performing arc flash analysis calculations, developing and conducting electrical safety training and developing company electrical safety standards to ensure OSHA and NFPA 70E compliance. Currently, Tommy is a Senior Power Engineer with Jacobs Technology Inc.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations