Some reactive maintenance is bound to happen for a couple of reasons.
One reason is that some equipment is normally run to failure. An example is a light switch. These typically can withstand decades of use, and it doesn’t make sense to perform preventive maintenance (PM) on them. In the rare event a light switch fails, you replace it.
Another is that equipment can fail for reasons PM does not prevent. For example, you perform all the recommended maintenance on a motor, but a series of high-voltage transients on your power distribution system damage the windings.
Overall, reactive maintenance should comprise a fraction of your maintenance efforts; a number like 15% is probably acceptable. If your number is very high, you wind up in firefighting mode. You get the resources for this mode by stealing them from PM and predictive maintenance (PdM). This sets up a vicious cycle.
It may seem counterintuitive, but if you let some equipment stay down while you ensure your PM and PdM get done, then overall downtime will decrease.