© Ganna Todica | Dreamstime.com
Dreamstime M 56936972 62ed28228560f

NFPA 70E: Electrical Safety Risk Assessment Procedure

Aug. 5, 2022
Do you know the three elements of a risk assessment procedure? Do you know the hierarchy of risk control methods?

NFPA 70E identifies the three elements of a risk assessment procedure as [110.5(H)(1)]:

  1. Identify hazards.
  2. Assess risks.
  3. Implement risk control according to the hierarchy of risk control methods.

The first Informational Note following this says the risk assessment procedure could identify when a second person could be required, and the training and equipment needed by that person.

The second Informational Note following this refers you to Informative Annex F. This annex sheds light on the principles and how to implement them. The tables and figures bring detail and clarity to the somewhat abbreviated text of 110.5(H).

Figure F.1 provides a closed-loop flow chart of the steps used to assess risk. First, you establish the context (e.g., what is the job, where is the job, etc.). Then you engage in three risk assessment steps (identify the hazards, analyze the risk, assess the risk); these steps are expounded on in Annex F. Then you implement risk control. Finally, you monitor and review how the risk controls are working and go back to the beginning of the process (establishing context) and start again if you need to.

In Annex F, you find a visually clear representation of what is meant by the hierarchy of risk control methods in the form of Table E.3. The first thing you want to try is eliminating the hazard. Table E.3 gives an example of how this might be done in a particular instance. There are six steps in the hierarchy, with the last one being PPE. You can often think of PPE as “when all else fails,” in the sense that the other methods don’t totally eliminate the risk.

Other times, you can think of PPE as “when all else fails” in the sense that PPE is a backup control method in case of an abnormal condition with one of the higher-up measures and its failure to protect as intended.

However, if we flip back to 110.5(H) and drop down to 110.5(H)(3), we see these six methods presented in a list format. Informational Note 2 tells you to go to the table we just discussed, but Informational Note 1 gives you a greater understanding of why this list is the way it is. The main concept here is to try to eliminate or reduce the risk at its source. That’s in contrast to using PPE to help you cope with the risk (or hazard).

When the risk is designed out of the system (or out of the job), the need to rely on human awareness, human judgment, and the absence of human error is greatly reduced if not totally eliminated.

Risk assessment always begins with identifying the hazards. They are not always obvious, so take the time to “dry run” the job and look for them. Once you know what they are, you need to determine the likelihood and severity of each. None of this does any good unless you take that third step, which is to implement risk control.

About the Author

Mark Lamendola

Mark is an expert in maintenance management, having racked up an impressive track record during his time working in the field. He also has extensive knowledge of, and practical expertise with, the National Electrical Code (NEC). Through his consulting business, he provides articles and training materials on electrical topics, specializing in making difficult subjects easy to understand and focusing on the practical aspects of electrical work.

Prior to starting his own business, Mark served as the Technical Editor on EC&M for six years, worked three years in nuclear maintenance, six years as a contract project engineer/project manager, three years as a systems engineer, and three years in plant maintenance management.

Mark earned an AAS degree from Rock Valley College, a BSEET from Columbia Pacific University, and an MBA from Lake Erie College. He’s also completed several related certifications over the years and even was formerly licensed as a Master Electrician. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and past Chairman of the Kansas City Chapters of both the IEEE and the IEEE Computer Society. Mark also served as the program director for, a board member of, and webmaster of, the Midwest Chapter of the 7x24 Exchange. He has also held memberships with the following organizations: NETA, NFPA, International Association of Webmasters, and Institute of Certified Professional Managers.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations