The Lighting Research Center (LRC) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y., recently released the results of a survey on the public’s view of ultraviolet (UV) disinfection products. In order to address concerns about these technologies, the LRC is currently examining a range of UV disinfection technologies. The goal of this work is to provide information that will help decision makers select UV products that are effective, safe, and energy efficient. A unique feature of this effort is the testing and evaluation of several UV disinfection products. This project is supported by members of the LRC’s Lighting Energy Alliance and the McClung Lighting Research Foundation.
The present pandemic has raised the profile of UV technologies intended to provide disinfection for buildings such as hospitals, long-term care facilities, and offices. While some UV technologies are mature, several new technologies are not, including some UV-LED products now being offered for sale. With increasing options for products and applications, many consumers and product specifiers have questions about the safety, effectiveness, and energy efficiency of these products.
"A hallmark of the LRC over the past 30 years has been our ability to accurately measure and evaluate lighting and related technologies," says Dr. Mark Rea, the lead researcher on this effort. "Timely, accurate information on the performance and safety of UV products is crucial to people making decisions about the purchase and use of these technologies."
To launch the project, the LRC administered an online survey asking about people's experiences with and concerns about UV disinfection products. Responses to the survey were received from more than 200 people in June and July 2020. The largest percentage of respondents were lighting specifiers (38%) followed by lighting manufacturers (28%). Also responding were energy service personnel (11%) and lighting manufacturers' representatives and distributors (9%). A few responses came from educators (8%), architects (3%), HVAC professionals (2%), and architectural engineers (1%).
In the survey, respondents were asked to select what they believed to be the three most promising types of UV disinfection products. The most popular choices were upper-room air purification (58%), in-duct air purification (55%), surface disinfection integrated with light fixtures (45%), and surface disinfection from (dedicated) wall- or ceiling-mounted products (40%).
Survey respondents were also asked to select what they viewed as the three most promising application types for UV disinfection. Most respondents (83%) selected healthcare applications. Half (50%) thought that transportation and long-term care (i.e., nursing home) facilities were a promising application for UV disinfection systems. Less than a third of respondents selected schools and colleges (33%), restaurant food service (31%), and office buildings (26%) among their top three rated application types.
Finally, respondents were asked to select the three greatest concerns they had with UV disinfection technologies. Most respondents (81%) were concerned about product safety, along with field verification of effectiveness (62%), and overall effectiveness of UV products (53%). One-third of respondents were concerned about damage to materials (33%) and the lack of clear building safety codes for use of UV disinfection in buildings (31%). Of lesser concern were ongoing maintenance (17%), high product cost (14%), and energy use (9%).
The LRC will use the results of this survey to guide the testing and evaluations, and to provide decision makers with technical information for selecting UV disinfection products and application types.
To learn more about the survey results, read the original release from the LRC.
