What's Wrong Here? Hint: Sunshine and Blue Skies

Can you identify the Code violation(s) in this photo?

 

 

 

 

 

 

How well do you know the Code? Think you can spot violations the original installer either ignored or couldn’t identify? Here’s your chance to moonlight as an electrical inspector and second-guess someone else’s work from the safety of your living room or office. Can you identify the Code violation(s) in this photo? Note: Submitted comments must include specific references from the 2011 NEC.

Hint: Sunshine and blue skies

‘Tell Them What They’ve Won...’

Using the 2011 NEC, correctly identify the Code violation(s) in this month’s photo — in 200 words or less — and you could win something to put in your tool­box. E-mail your response, including your name and mailing address, to neccodeguy@hotmail.com, and Russ will select three winners (excluding manufacturers and prior winners) at random from the correct submissions. Note that submissions without an address will not be eligible to win. Winners will receive a fluorescent lighting tester from Milwaukee Tool, valued at $199. The product allows complete lamp, ballast, and pin testing, before or after install, without dismantling fixtures.

(*Please allow six to eight weeks for delivery of tools.)

 

DECEMBER WINNERS

The number 10 is a Code violation when it’s the number of wires stuffed into a foot lug that’s designed for only one conductor.

Our winners this month include: Ryan Young, an electrical designer with MEPIS in Chicago; Jon Perruzzi, an electrical engineer with SMRT in Portland, Maine; and Diana Kemper, a CADD coordinator with Semac Electric in New Britain, Conn. They all knew that terminals for more than one conductor shall be identified as such, in accordance with the last paragraph in 110.14(A).

Because the single barrel lug installed was only identified for use with one wire at a time, this would also be a violation of 110.3(B), which requires equipment to be installed and used in accordance with its listing or labeling. Our winners also knew the requirements in section 408.40 for panelboard grounding which requires, a panelboard wired with nonmetallic raceways or nonmetallic cables or “where separate equipment grounding conductors are provided”, to have a terminal bar installed inside the cabinet and bonded to the cabinet if metal. The terminal bar must also be connected to the equipment grounding conductor of the circuit feeding the panelboard. The use of a sheet metal screw to secure the lug may also violate the requirements in 250.8.

Discuss this Article 4

Dave Radford (not verified)
on Feb 22, 2013

I'm sorry I just do not see anything wrong here. It is a lovo installation, and at the time of install I imagine there was not much of a code issue with what they had done.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 11, 2013

I see a few things that are questionable. The camera may need to be in a weather resistant housing.
The conduit in which the video cable is housed. It seems to be broken and someone used black tape around it to mend it. That is not correct. The plastic flexible conduit is connected to the EMT conduit via a 90 degree connector box.It appears that the electrician drilled a hole into the cover plate and connected to plastic conduit there. There is no room in that 90 degree connector for that. The EMT connector is not designed for that. It is only designed as an access point for a tight corner connector. ON second thought it might be PVC and not EMT. But my theory still holds. Can you use plastic brackets to hold pipe onto pole?

saberger_vt
on Mar 15, 2013

Assuming liquid tight metallic conduit:
NEC 350.24 states bends in conduit shall be so make that the conduit will not be damaged and the internal diameter of the conduit will not be effectively reduced.

Also there is no support for this conduit NEC 350.30

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 22, 2013

Article 362 Type ENT (AKA Smurf tube)
362.12(6) Not permitted in exposed areas
362.12(8) Not permitted where exposed to direct sunlight
362.30(A) Not secured and supported
362.48 Joint is not approved method (looks like heat shrink?)
362.6 Not a listed fitting used for attachment at the camera

It does not appear to be an approved use for the short radius conduit body and attaching the ENT connector through the cover also seems to be a violation.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine ID
(optional)

White Papers
EC&M Learning Center
Webinars
EC&M TV
Apr. 15, 2013
video

The Westex Difference

Learn what sets Westex apart from other flame resistant fabric manufacturers....More

Newsletter Signup

Connect With Us