advanced search

Are You Ready For IT Evolution?

May 19, 2005 10:37 AM, By Michael Eby, Editor-in-Chief

In my pre-magazine days, I worked with a guy at the electric utility company who was passionate about researching and implementing new technology ...

In my pre-magazine days, I worked with a guy at the electric utility company who was passionate about researching and implementing new technology. He was always finding the latest software and hardware devices to increase worker efficiency and improve the electrical system’s reliability levels. The problem was he could think of new ways to use technology to improve a process or system before most of us could even start to feel comfortable operating the one we currently had up and running. Sure, he was doing what he thought was best for the utility—and having fun doing it—but the rest of us just felt left behind.

To make matters worse, he seemed to get a new boss every few years, and each of these new supervisors would set a different priority list for what projects he should be working on. As a result, many of the projects he started never really moved to full completion or delivered the projected cost savings initially promised.

Every company has a technology guru like my co-worker from the utility. It may be an estimator who knows all there is to know about tweaking Excel files to spit out the most accurate bid possible. Or it may be a project manager who improves the company’s billing cycles by figuring out a faster way to move field data to a centralized corporate database. Every company could use at least one person like that, but for all of their innovation and forward-thinking, they aren’t the individuals who should be leading technological change within the organization.

If a company really wants to drive internal technological change, it needs an executive-level staff person who possesses technical expertise, can make decisions about which technologies are most likely to generate the highest rate of return, and has the horsepower to champion the right projects through to full completion. Only then will the company continue to succeed and stay one step ahead of its competition.

As much as I’d like to take the credit for dreaming up that concept, I can’t. A lot of the biggest electrical design firms are well aware of the benefits of enlisting a high-power employee for that role and have been taking advantage of that IT structure for several years. Whether your firm is big or small, the ideals these companies have built their technology hierarchy on are applicable in most situations. And if you were hoping to get an inside look at what some of these firms’ IT executives do, you’re in luck. In this month’s cover story, “Leading Technological Innovation From Within,” on page 42, Amy Florence Fischbach takes a closer look at how a few of the top electrical design firms in this market have addressed this issue, either by appointing a single executive or via a tag team approach through two individuals.

High-tech tools will always be a part of the business, so the ability to find the latest and greatest advances is what will set you apart from your competition—and that means choosing the right person for the job. You can either trust the guy with all the ideas but none of the follow-through or a tech-savvy exec who has the corporate muscle to finish the job. Both may know where to find what you need, but only one of them will know how to make it work for you.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!

© 2012 Penton Business Media, Inc.

---

Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus

Browse Back Issues Select an Issue EC&M Magazine | April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 1, 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 1, 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 1, 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 2006 March 1, 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 February 1, 1995 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 December 1, 1996 November 1, 1996 October 1, 1996 September 1, 1996 August 1, 1996 July 1, 1996 June 1, 1996 May 1, 1996 April 1, 1996 March 1, 1996 February 1, 1996 January 1, 1996 December 1, 1995 November 30, 1995 November 1, 1995 October 1, 1995 September 1, 1995 August 1, 1995 July 1, 1995 June 1, 1995 May 1, 1995 April 1, 1995 March 1, 1995

browse e-newsletters