If you’re a consulting engineer who frequently designs generator installations or a facility engineer who manages generators that supply power to your building(s), you’re undoubtedly familiar with NFPA 110. But are you aware of the specific testing requirements for components of an emergency power supply system (EPSS) under this standard? If not, it’s time to get up to speed. Let’s take a look at what’s involved with following the “letter of the code” as it relates to routine testing during design or upon building commissioning.
EPSSs are designed to be the reliable backup when electric utility power is lost. Considerable cost is invested on a typical EPSS installation to provide power for life safety lighting and critical power in buildings. There are also installations in many facilities — where entire buildings are served by emergency power — that can cost hundreds, thousands, or even millions of dollars to supply emergency power.
In many instances, once the emergency system components are installed and commissioned, they’re not tested properly or as frequently as they should be. Generators may be routinely started and allowed to run for short periods of time, but load is not placed on the generator set through switching of the building transfer switches because of the impact to building equipment and occupants. Other times, transfer switches and other electrical components that are part of the system are not exercised, which, by the way, is a Code violation.
NFPA 110 requires you to perform routine tasks and provide documentation to ensure system reliability.
NFPA 110 background
NFPA 110 is the “Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems.” It defines an EPSS as, “A complete functioning source of electric (emergency) power of the required capacity and quality, coupled to a system of conductors, disconnecting means and overcurrent protective devices, transfer switches, and all control, supervisory, and support devices up to and including the load terminals of the transfer equipment needed for the system to operate as a safe and reliable source of power.”
In existence since 1976, the NFPA 110 Committee has focused on issues that occurred after the New York City blackout on July 13, 1997. This includes addressing the demand for guidelines for the assembly, installation, and performance of the electrical power systems supplying critical and essential needs during primary power source outages and establishing necessary equipment requirements to achieve a suitable and reliable on-site auxiliary electrical power source.
Formally adopted in 1985, the NFPA 110 document created the framework for prototype testing and maintenance requirements. Since then, additional testing requirements have been added to include installation and operational maintenance as well as testing beyond the generator — transfer switch(es), batteries, and breakers serving the electric utility and emergency power supplies are now required to be tested periodically to conform to the latest edition of NFPA 110, which has three categories for classifying an EPSS (EPSS Classification).
Section 8.3 of the 2005 Edition of NFPA 110 requires maintenance and operational testing to be performed “to ensure to a reasonable degree that the system is capable of supplying service within the time specified for the type and for the time specified for the class.” It describes the method for developing a maintenance and testing program as well as recordkeeping of EPSS components.
Section 8.4.1 states, “EPSSs, including all appurtenant components, shall be inspected weekly and exercised under load at least monthly.” Section 8.4 as a whole goes into detail about testing procedures and requirements for specific components (click here to see Table); however, the monthly load requirement bears the most impact on a facility.
What happens when you transfer loads served by the EPSS? There is a potential for many challenges posed by a power interruption to occur during a normal open transition transfer. Although the loss of power can be merely a second or two during the transfer from the normal to emergency source, the building mechanical systems and equipment can be significantly affected.
There are many potential building system issues that can arise during transfer between the building normal and emergency power supplies. When certain systems/components are served by an EPSS, problems and solutions may include the following:
Fire alarm system. Many fire alarm systems have latching troubles that require a reset, such as when power supplies (supplemental notification appliance circuit panels) lose the normal power source or are switched at the automatic transfer switch (ATS). You can mitigate this situation through some minor fire alarm panel reprogramming. There can also be problems with voltage transients that occur during ATS switching. Installation of in-line surge suppressors will help mitigate these issues.
Building automation system (BAS). There are potential issues with power supplies that fail on BAS panels, causing them to lose their program and go into default mode when the ATS switches. This can be mitigated through the implementation of a regular preventive maintenance program for battery checking and replacement. In addition, delays during power switching to equipment connected to the BAS can have detrimental effects in the building coordination with damper and HVAC system interlocks, pumps and motorized valve operation, etc., especially when not all components are connected to the same source of power. For example, dampers may close if they sense a loss of power, but a fan could continue to run at full speed, potentially causing a hazardous scenario and damage to the system.
Variable-frequency drives (VFDs). Tied to the BAS, many VFDs will need to be programmed to “ride through” or catch the equipment they serve “on the fly” to prevent a complete shutdown and restart upon a loss of power or ATS switching. One example of where this is critical is where the VFD serves fume hood exhausts, and loss of negative pressure can pose a safety or health hazard to building occupants as it could allow toxic gas to be released into a room. Another situation could be an operating room where a change in room pressure could introduce contaminants into the space.
Research equipment. There is a potential impact on research areas that are served by emergency power. Running extended periods on the generator could result in damage to sensitive equipment due to potential voltage fluctuations under varying load conditions. Because loss of data and/or research can be devastating, installing voltage regulation equipment can help reduce your risks.
Ultralow/refrigeration equipment. Some equipment of this type requires a manual reset of a local alarm or even the equipment itself upon any loss of power.
Gas cabinets. There are interlocks and safeties installed on many gas cabinets to reduce or eliminate a safety risk. Loss of power, even for a few seconds, can lock gas cabinets out and disconnect power to any equipment being used, costing downtime and loss of revenue for the time the monthly EPSS testing occurs.
Computer/communications. Computer servers are often connected to the EPSS in today’s technology-driven society to allow for research and voice over IP to continue to be maintained. If an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) is not installed upstream of the server equipment, it will experience a hard reset upon the ATS switching. This is important to note, because buildings today are advanced — and losing communications can impact facility services.
EPSS components. There is a potential for equipment mechanical failure on older components (particularly ATS) with regular exercising. Routine switching can greatly reduce life expectancy of equipment that is greater than 20 yr old.
Minimizing EPSS testing impact
Approaches to mitigating the impact on your facility range from specific to broad. The implementation depends largely on the extent of work required to address the particular needs of your facility.
For large facilities with intertwined systems, there are two widely used approaches for entire single-point EPSS integration. The first is UPS and flywheel technology, which uses specific equipment to fill the time gap between source switching. When a UPS option is selected, power quality can also be improved by using a double-conversion online interactive-style unit. Flywheel technology uses inertia to provide a mechanical (kinetic) energy storage source for a very short period of time. Both of these options are expensive, take up floor space, and require floor loading consideration — and require their own routine maintenance. However, they do adequately address switching problems and are well suited for new installation and retrofit applications where space is available.
The second option, using a closed transition ATS, synchronizes and momentarily (<50 msec) parallels the electric utility and generator sources. Installing this equipment at the ATS or immediately downstream (load side) offers a one-stop installation. This is a fairly expensive option requiring engineering calculations to be performed to ensure the electrical system fault currents are considered. It does not, however, have the same routine maintenance a UPS or flywheel requires. This type of approach is best suited for new construction but can be used in renovations.
Dollars and sense
Equipment to reduce the effect of ATS switching can be expensive to purchase and install — not to mention costly to maintain. An overall assessment of each facility and life-cycle cost analyses will assist in determining the best approach to resolving switching issues.
It should be noted that operational maintenance and testing can bear even greater costs over the long term than addressing the switching of ATS. Required monthly testing will cost both in used fuel and personnel time. For example, a 200kW diesel generator loaded 50% and tested for 30 min. will consume approximately 10 gal of fuel per month. In addition, personnel policy may require that the EPSS be monitored during the duration of the test and documentation of the EPSS be performed, which may take an hour per month. While this may not seem significant for a single building or facility, in a university or other type of large campus-style facility (where there may be as many as 100 generators powering academic buildings, research buildings, office buildings, and residence halls), the costs for NFPA 110 compliance can be staggering.
Benefits of regular EPSS testing
Monthly testing of the EPSS and placing load on the generator set through ATS switching will burn more fuel, reducing the possibility of microbe issues in diesel tanks and wetstacking and slobber in diesel generators. It will also allow for load trending and provide information on the system capacity for any future additions or modifications.
Overall, routine EPSS testing and proper preventive maintenance will allow you to be better prepared for catastrophic events, natural disasters, and rolling blackouts. In addition, Code required testing of EPSS should be considered during design to resolve recurring and potentially costly disruptions to building systems and occupants.
Loomis, P.E. is a senior electrical engineer with Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.