What's Wrong Here?
Jul 22, 2010 5:11 PM, By Brian J. McPartland, NEC Consultant
Hint: Think clearances
This permanently installed outdoor pool presents us with two Code violations. The first violation is contrary to the rule of 680.22(C)(1), and the second does not satisfy the requirements of 680.22(D).
In 680.22(C)(1), the Code says, "In outdoor pool areas, luminaires, lighting outlets, and ceiling-suspended (paddle) fans installed above the pool or the area extending 1.5 m (5 ft) from the inside walls of the pool shall be installed at a height not less than 3.7 m (12 ft) above the maximum water level of the pool." Unfortunately, this pole is located approximately 4˝ ft from the inside wall of the pool, only 10 ft above grade, and only about 5˝ ft above the maximum water level. It should be noted that if this luminaire pole was already in place when the pool was installed — which it wasn't — the rule of 680.22(C)(3) would permit such installation, provided ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection was installed to protect people in the pool's vicinity. Remember, GFCIs are intended for personnel protection; not equipment protection.
The location of the switch on this pole is a violation of 680.22(D), which says "Switching devices shall be located at least 1.5 m (5 ft) horizontally from the inside walls of the pool unless separated from the pool by a solid fence, wall, or other permanent barrier. Alternatively, a switch that is listed as being acceptable for use within 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted." This switch is not listed for installation within 5 ft of the pool's inside walls, so its location on the pole is considered a violation.
One major point to take away from this discussion is this: Code rules that stipulate minimum distances/clearances for equipment and conductors should be easy to comply with simply because you know the minimums. However, where there are extenuating circumstances (e.g., lack of room or obstructions within the desired equipment location), it will be necessary to consult with the local electrical inspector to secure "special permission" to deviate from the Code-mandated clearances. This is only if the inspector feels that the installation will still be safe. Where there are no such extenuating circumstances — as one inspector once told me — You don't need a ruling, you need a ruler.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media, Inc.
Code Challenge
Code Quiz
May 10, 2012 12:29 PM, By Steven Owen, National Code Seminars
When installing a shielded cable or a twisted pair cable in a Class I, Division 1 location where a cable seal is required, when is it not required to remove the shielding material or separate the twisted pairs of those type cables?...
More Code Quizzes
Code Q&A
May 24, 2012 10:42 AM, By Mike Holt, NEC Consultant
Q. What labeling does the Code require in regard to arc flash hazard warning?...
More Code Q&As
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus
advertisement
what's wrong here?
What's Wrong Here?
May 10, 2012 12:44 PM
View all What's Wrong Here?
What's Wrong Here
Sponsored By:
product spotlight
EV charger tester
May 25, 2012 8:26 AM
The Electrician is portable tester that verifies critical power and safety requirements of electric vehicle (EV) chargers...
View all 2012 Product Spotlights
Free Product Info
Our Product Information site is the ultimate online resource for products and services offered by Advertisers featured in our Magazine. This service is provided as a quick and easy way to request Product Information online. Get FREE product information now.



































