What's Wrong Here?
Jul 17, 2008 11:24 PM, By Joe Tedesco, NEC Columnist
Hint: Upgrade equals disaster
”We were asked to do a load test on a standby generator,” says Paul Ryan of Paul A. Ryan, Inc., Wicomico Church, Va. “I ended up making a jaw-dropping discovery.”
“This service upgrade was made approximately eight years ago. They converted a 320A overhead feed to a 600A underground feed with a pedestal-mounted CT cabinet. Rather than change the service conductors, they used the old wall-mounted meter pan and cover (with a plastic meter blank) as a J-box. To make matters worse, the old overhead mast was unbolted and left loose from the top of the meter pan, allowing rain water to cascade over the connections within. An antenna guide wire was even tied to the top of the mast.
“With only one wall strap keeping the mast upright, every time the wind blew, the abandon mast conductors pushed on the hot conductors in the meter pan. If you look to the left, you’ll see where one of the split bolt legs blew a hole through the cover.
“After bringing this to the attention of building manager, we were contracted to correct this mess of violations. We left it Code compliant, of course.”
I can’t find anything here that would allow this to be done. Section 110.3 focuses on the examination, identification, installation, and use of equipment.
110.3(A) states, “In judging equipment, considerations such as the following shall be evaluated:”
- “Suitability for installation and use in conformity with the provisions of this Code FPN: Suitability of equipment use may be identified by a description marked on or provided with a product to identify the suitability of the product for a specific purpose, environment, or application. Suitability of equipment may be evidenced by listing or labeling.
- ”Mechanical strength and durability, including, for parts designed to enclose and protect other equipment, the adequacy of the protection thus provided
- ”Wire-bending and connection space
- ”Electrical insulation
- ”Heating effects under normal conditions of use and also under abnormal conditions likely to arise in service
- ”Arcing effects
- ”Classification by type, size, voltage, current capacity, and specific use
- ”Other factors that contribute to the practical safeguarding of persons using or likely to come in contact with the equipment”
I also believe that abandoned wiring of all types should be removed.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media, Inc.
Code Challenge
Code Quiz
May 10, 2012 12:29 PM, By Steven Owen, National Code Seminars
When installing a shielded cable or a twisted pair cable in a Class I, Division 1 location where a cable seal is required, when is it not required to remove the shielding material or separate the twisted pairs of those type cables?...
More Code Quizzes
Code Q&A
May 24, 2012 10:42 AM, By Mike Holt, NEC Consultant
Q. What labeling does the Code require in regard to arc flash hazard warning?...
More Code Q&As
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus
advertisement
what's wrong here?
What's Wrong Here?
May 10, 2012 12:44 PM
View all What's Wrong Here?
What's Wrong Here
Sponsored By:
product spotlight
EV charger tester
May 25, 2012 8:26 AM
The Electrician is portable tester that verifies critical power and safety requirements of electric vehicle (EV) chargers...
View all 2012 Product Spotlights
Free Product Info
Our Product Information site is the ultimate online resource for products and services offered by Advertisers featured in our Magazine. This service is provided as a quick and easy way to request Product Information online. Get FREE product information now.



































