What's Wrong Here?
Jul 13, 2007 2:21 PM, By Joe Tedesco, NEC Columnist
Hint: I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night!
Okay, it was actually last month when I discovered this damaged makeshift support structure that was being used to secure lighting equipment to this tree for the hotel’s parking lot spaces. This was one of about three similar arrangements that were all in the same condition.
It looks like the installer used the brackets in an attempt to avoid the type of damage shown in the photograph. Although the brackets were adequately secured to the tree, the exposed equipment was located about the same height as a car or truck bumper, which most likely caused damage to the lighting components. In addition, the expansion fittings used here would never help prevent this type of damage.
Needless to say, the installer was most likely not familiar with NEC rules and showed a lack of common sense. I could cite my favorite reference in the NEC as the need for protection from physical damage (300.4) or the lack of a proper enclosure as defined in Art. 100.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.
Code Challenge
Code Quiz
Nov 5, 2009 5:24 PM, By Steven Owen
What are the minimum and maximum lengths permitted for the grounding conductor on network-powered broadband communications systems network interface units that contain protectors?...
More Code Quizzes
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus
advertisement
what's wrong here?
|
What's Wrong Here?Nov 5, 2009 11:50 AM |
|
What's Wrong Here?Oct 22, 2009 11:16 PM |
|
What's Wrong Here?Oct 8, 2009 3:32 PM |
View all What's Wrong Here?
What's Wrong Here
Sponsored By:






























