What's Wrong Here?
Mar 25, 2010 12:36 PM, By Brian J. McPartland, NEC Consultant
Hint: Required field marking
Here, we see a photo of a service panel and transfer switch at a residential occupancy. While all may appear well and good, the installer failed to provide the Code-mandated signage, which is a violation of 702.8. This is a common mistake and often overlooked rule, which is not surprising since the requirement for the required field marking is given in Art. 702, Optional Standby Systems — located in the back of the Code book.
The requirements outlined in 702.8 read as follows, "A sign shall be placed at the service-entrance equipment that indicates the type and location of on-site optional standby power sources. A sign shall not be required for unit equipment for standby illumination." The basic idea here is to alert fire-response or maintenance personnel of the existence of the generator, or other power source, and its location to help ensure that any individual who disconnects utility power is not injured or killed when the generator is started and begins back-feeding power to the service equipment, which is a "make-sense" proposition to enhance safety.
This signage is like other warning signs in that it has to contain instructions for an appropriate action. In addition to identifying the hazard, such a field marking must also include instructions with regard to the action that must be taken by the reader. In this example, additional wording such as "Keep Out" is needed. Failure to provide such an instruction has been ruled to be akin to having no sign at all. And the individual who placed the warning or caution sign has not effectively met the requirement for the Code-required field marking.
The NEC generally does not give exact wording, but instead indicates what information must be conveyed by the warning/caution sign. As noted in 702.8, the Code tells us to identify the location and type of on-site optional standby power sources. Therefore, it seems the installer should have created a label that said something like, "Disconnection of the service main will not completely de-energize the premises electrical system. The generator disconnect must also be opened." This approach will better serve to meet the Code rule and the courts’ findings regarding warning/caution signs.
It should also be noted that a sign must be provided whether the on-site power source is classified as "legally required" (Art. 701) or "optional" (Art. 702). Additionally, the last sentence eliminates the need for such a field marking for "unit equipment," which employ an alternate power source for emergency illumination.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media, Inc.
Code Challenge
Code Quiz
May 10, 2012 12:29 PM, By Steven Owen, National Code Seminars
When installing a shielded cable or a twisted pair cable in a Class I, Division 1 location where a cable seal is required, when is it not required to remove the shielding material or separate the twisted pairs of those type cables?...
More Code Quizzes
Code Q&A
May 24, 2012 10:42 AM, By Mike Holt, NEC Consultant
Q. What labeling does the Code require in regard to arc flash hazard warning?...
More Code Q&As
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus
advertisement
what's wrong here?
What's Wrong Here?
May 10, 2012 12:44 PM
View all What's Wrong Here?
What's Wrong Here
Sponsored By:
product spotlight
EV charger tester
May 25, 2012 8:26 AM
The Electrician is portable tester that verifies critical power and safety requirements of electric vehicle (EV) chargers...
View all 2012 Product Spotlights
Free Product Info
Our Product Information site is the ultimate online resource for products and services offered by Advertisers featured in our Magazine. This service is provided as a quick and easy way to request Product Information online. Get FREE product information now.



































