What's Wrong Here?

May 1, 2010 12:00 PM, By Brian J. McPartland, NEC Consultant

Here’s your chance to moonlight as an electrical inspector and second-guess someone else’s work from the safety of your living room or office. Can you identify the Code violation(s) in this photo?

How well do you know the Code? Think you can spot violations the original installer either ignored or couldn't identify? Here's your chance to moonlight as an electrical inspector and second-guess someone else's work from the safety of your living room or office. Can you identify the Code violation(s) in this photo?

Hint: Think in terms of percentage

‘TELL THEM WHAT THEY'VE WON…’

Using the 2008 NEC, correctly identify the Code violation(s) in this month's photo — in 200 words or less — and you could win something to put in your tool-box. E-mail your response to brianjbmcpar@aol.com, and he'll select three winners (excluding manufacturers and prior winners) at random from the correct submissions. Winners will receive a set of insulated hand tools from Ideal Industries, Inc., valued at more than $125.* The set includes 9.25-in. insulated side-cutting pliers, 10-in. insulated tongue-and-groove pliers, and a 0.25-in. × 6-in. insulated screwdriver. (* Please allow six to eight weeks for delivery of tools.)

March Winners

Although we received a number of correct answers this month, these three were the first to respond: David Falco, master electrician, Lippolis Electric, Bronx, N.Y.; Eric Letourneau, president, Wire Nutz, Inc., Fort Pierce, Fla.; and Andrew Yates, electrician, Skmes Electric, Powell, Tenn. It's nice to see that so many of you recognized this installation violated the rule given in 110.26(F), which focuses on Dedicated Equipment Space.

This particular application is in violation of part (F)(1)(a) of 110.26. This part of the rule states, “The space equal to the width and depth of the equipment and extending from the floor to a height of 1.8 m (6 ft) above the equipment or to the structural ceiling, whichever is lower, shall be dedicated to the electrical installation. No piping, ducts, leak protection apparatus, or other equipment foreign to the electrical installation shall be located in this zone.”

As you can see, there is plastic water piping located directly above the panelboards, which is contrary to the wording of this rule. It would seem that using sheetrock to cover the joists above the panelboards will remediate this violation by providing a “structural ceiling.” In that manner, the literal wording of the rule can be satisfied, and the violation can be removed.

Another violation cited was related to rule 334.15(C), which applies to Basements and Crawl Spaces. The applicable wording is given in the third and fifth sentences: “NM cable installed on the wall of an unfinished basement shall be permitted to be installed in a listed conduit or tubing or shall be protected in accordance with 300.4,” and, “The NM cable sheath shall extend through the conduit or tubing and into the outlet or device box not less than 6 mm (¼ in.).” Because the wording in 334.15(C) references Sec. 300.4, which addresses “Protection Against Physical Damage,” essentially where cables and raceways are run through or parallel to framing members — and these NM cables are not being run in such a manner — it would seem that 334.15(C) does not apply. Additionally, the wording in the fifth sentence specifically discusses “outlet or device boxes,” which is not where these cables are terminating. Given the fact that the actual wording used in 334.15(C) does not seem to address this application, it would appear this installation is not in violation of that Code section.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!

Code Challenge

Code Quiz

May 10, 2012 12:29 PM, By Steven Owen, National Code Seminars

When installing a shielded cable or a twisted pair cable in a Class I, Division 1 location where a cable seal is required, when is it not required to remove the shielding material or separate the twisted pairs of those type cables?...


More Code Quizzes

Code Q&A

May 24, 2012 10:42 AM, By Mike Holt, NEC Consultant

Q. What labeling does the Code require in regard to arc flash hazard warning?...


More Code Q&As
 



Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

what's wrong here?

What's Wrong Here?

May 10, 2012 12:44 PM

What's Wrong Here?

Apr 19, 2012 10:09 AM

What's Wrong Here?

Apr 5, 2012 2:27 PM

View all What's Wrong Here?

product spotlight

EV charger tester

May 25, 2012 8:26 AM

EV charger tester

The Electrician is portable tester that verifies critical power and safety requirements of electric vehicle (EV) chargers...

View all 2012 Product Spotlights

Free Product Info

Our Product Information site is the ultimate online resource for products and services offered by Advertisers featured in our Magazine. This service is provided as a quick and easy way to request Product Information online. Get FREE product information now.

Recent Comments

More...


Social Media

More ways to stay informed...

follow us on twitter

Find us on Facebook

EC&M Whitepaper

Arc Mitigation –A Three-Step Approach

Did you know that an arc-flash incident hospitalizes 5-7 workers per day in North America, severely impacting processes and profitability with lost production? Download This Sponsored Whitepaper Today!

What's New in Residential Cabling?
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Time: 2:00pm ET


In this The Home Depot sponsored Low Voltage Webinar, Ron Kipper RCDD / NTS will discuss the need for compression style coaxial connectors and the migration of the entire CATV, Satellite and Audio / Video industry to them. Register Today!

Grounding Versus Bonding
Now Available On-Demand


In this 60-minute FREE webinar, Mike Holt of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. will explain the purpose of grounding and bonding as related to the most current requirements set forth in the 2011 NEC. Register to View On-Demand!

resources

product info icon

product info

tradeshow icon

tradeshow

research icon

research

industry links

industry links

rss icon

rss

Browse Back Issues

Browse Back Issues