Sizing Circuit Protection and Conductors β€” Part 1

What is in this article?:

Understanding which NEC ampacity table to use when sizing circuit protection, and how to determine the minimum ampacity of your conductors

Suppose you have a 60A breaker supplying a branch circuit. What size conductors do you need for that circuit? One table in the NEC says No. 8; another says No. 4. Which one is right? What does the note about ambient temperature correction factors mean? And how do you know you need that size breaker in the first place?

Let’s start with looking at the order of the calculations. The overcurrent protection device (OCPD) — whether a breaker or a fuse — defines the circuit. So sizing the OCPD logically comes before sizing the conductors. But before you can size the OCPD, you have to determine what load it will supply.

Load calculations

Loads may be continuous (operating 3 hr or longer) or noncontinuous. Your first step in branch circuit load calculations is to characterize each load as either continuous or noncontinuous. This distinction is critical. If you mischaracterize just one continuous load as noncontinuous, you could undersize the OCPD and the conductors.
Make sure you avoid the trap of assuming lighting is noncontinuous if controlled by occupancy sensors. There’s no guarantee they won’t run less than 3 hr. Even if the controls shut the lights off after 2 hr, sensor trips can keep extending the runtime. Similar logic applies to other types of loads that are on automatic control.

A good practice when performing branch circuit calculations is to make a table with two columns — one for
continuous and one for noncontinuous. For each load you can determine that will run less than 3 hr at a time, list it in the noncontinuous column. List all other loads in the continuous column.

You also need to determine if the load you’re supplying is a specific-purpose load covered by another Article in the NEC. To do that, look for your load type in Table 210.2. If it’s a motor, it’s always covered by Art. 430. If it’s a hermetic motor (used in air-conditioners, refrigeration units, and chillers), it’s covered by Art. 430 as well as by
Art. 440 [440.3].

At this point, it seems we’re ready to multiply the total of the continuous loads by 125% [210.19(A)] and then add that number to the total of the noncontinuous loads. For branch circuits, it’s usually just that simple — but not always.

Some loads operate in a mutually exclusive fashion. That’s why when you’re sizing feeders, for example, you use the larger of the heating or air-conditioning load when determining the total load.

Rarely does a branch circuit have loads that are mutually exclusive. However, it can happen. For example, consider an industrial shop that has one portable arc welder and 10 welding outlets. Only one outlet will be in use at any given time (the others are then excluded by dint of not having an arc welder), so all of these are on a single branch circuit.

OCPD sizing

Once you’ve correctly calculated the load, you’re ready to size the OCPD. Breakers and fuses come in standard sizes [240.6]. To size the OCPD, follow what’s known as the “next-size-up” rule. Look at the standard sizes that are larger than your load, and pick the one that’s closest. Do not apply this to motor overload protection. For motor OCPDs, refer to Art. 430. But wait. You calculated your load in VA, and the OCPDs are rated in amps. You’ll have to convert VA to amps. In a DC circuit, you’d just divide VA by the nominal voltage to derive amps. For AC loads, you must also divide by the appropriate phase factor.

For 3-phase loads, you divide the VA by the nominal voltage and by the square root of three (approximately 1.732). If your total 3-phase load in a 480V system is 50,000VA, what size breaker do you need?

50,000VA ÷ (480V × 1.732) = 60.2A. The next size up is 70A.

Note that some types of single-phase loads are routinely supplied by a 3-phase panel. Lights, for example, are single-phase loads. Just make sure you wire the lighting system to achieve balance across the phases.

Conductor sizing

Because sizing conductors isn’t a one-size-fits-all process, the NEC has several ampacity tables. Making matters a bit more complicated, the tables have multiple temperature-rating columns. You can avoid confusion here if you understand the logic of the tables (see Table and Column Selection).

After you select the right table and column in that table, you must apply the:

  • Temperature correction factors [310.15(B)(2)], and
  • Adjustment factors [310.15(B)(3)].

Depending upon your application, you might also need to apply the correction factors in 310.15(B)(4) through 310.15(B)(7).

The temperature correction factors are based on the expected ambient temperature where you’re installing the conductor. Use the peak expected temperature, not an average.

Adjustment factors vary, depending upon the wiring method. At this point, you should already know the type of raceway and conductor you’re using. You should also know if a raceway or cable will carry more than three current-carrying conductors. Those design decisions logically come ahead of sizing the raceway and conductors, though sometimes it’s necessary to change them late in this process.

Once you’ve applied these factors, you have your conductor ampacity number. Now you just need to look it up in the table you selected, using the appropriate temperature rating column. Follow it to the left to see the minimum conductor size.

Note: You might increase the conductor size due to voltage drop or other considerations.

Typical lighting circuit

Let’s apply the process we’ve learned to sizing the OCPD and conductors for a 480V branch circuit consisting of six 400W lights.

Here’s the 7-step process:

Step 1: Characterize the loads. Regardless of any controls, characterize these lights as continuous loads; there’s no guarantee they will be on for less than 3 hr.

Step 2: Calculate total load. Look up the input wattage (manufacturer’s data). For example, assume it’s 452W.
Calculate kVA. Since lights are actually single-phase loads, you can skip this step. You do not divide the watts by 1.732 for this type of load, even if supplied by 480V.

Step 3: Calculate amps. (452W ÷ 480V) × 6 = 5.65A.

Step 4: Size the OCPD. Use the next size up [240.6], which is 15A.

Step 5. Identify the table. You’re running 3 THHN conductors in EMT. After reading the table headings, it’s obvious that Table 310.15(B)(16) is the correct ampacity table.

Step 6. Apply temperature correction factor. The architect gave you 125°F as the highest expected ambient temperature in the ceiling space. From Table 310.15(B)(2)(b), we see this requires us to multiply the allowable ampacity by 0.5. Alternatively, we can multiply our load amps by 2.

Step 7. Size the conductor per the required ampacity. THHN is in the 90° column, but your connectors are rated for 60°C. Using the 60°C column, we find this circuit requires a conductor at least 14 AWG.

The process for calculating a feeder is different from that of calculating a branch circuit. In Part 2, we’ll dive into that and see what to do.        

Lamendola is an electrical consultant based in Merriam, Kan. He can be reached at comments@mindconnection.com.

 

Discuss this Article 3

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 16, 2013

I question your calculation of the ambient temp correction.
I belive you should use Table 310.15B2a based on 30 deg C coordinated with 30 deg C in Table 310.15B(16).
THHN is rated at 90 deg C, so the 90 deg C column can be used for ambient correction. At 125 deg F, the factor is 0.76 (90 C column table 310.15B2a).
25 A (90 C column table 310.15B(16)) x 0.76 = 19A.
Final result is 14AWG, but with the correct method of ambient temp correction calculation.

Mark Lamendola (not verified)
on Feb 16, 2013

The NEC is a bit confusing on the issue of temperature correction. I personally can't decipher the answer just from reading 310.15. But the NEC does provide a way to find the answer.

First, here is why I used the 60 DegrC column. We're using the 60DegrF column of the table, not the 90DegrF column. So it seems logical you would also use the 60DegrF temperature adjustment factors. Even though THHN is rated at 90 DegrC, for purposes of ampacity for this circuit it's rated at 60 DegrC because its terminations are rated at 60 DegrC [110.14(C)].

That said, I see why you might use the 90 DegrC column; we are derating the conductor and not the terminations. Or are we? That approach assumes the terminations are not also in that elevated temperature space. Example D3(a) in Annex D presents such a scenario.

If you look at Example D3(a), you will find clarification on this question. The question being do we use the conductor's maximum temperature rating or do we use the temperature rating of the circuit when selecting the temperature correction factor column?

The answer is we use the temperature rating of the circuit. One place you can see this illustrated in Example D3(a) is under the heading "Ungrounded Feeder Conductors" and please note what it says in the surrounding explanations.

Also, read 310.15(A)(2) and 310.15(A)(3).

Jacobo (not verified)
on Mar 25, 2013

I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that the fundament for load calculations is based on Article 220. In the case of branch circuits please refer to 220.10 and in the particular case of general-use lighting circuits, please refer to Table 220.12

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine ID
(optional)

White Papers
EC&M Learning Center
Webinars
EC&M TV
Apr. 15, 2013
video

Westex Flash Fire Testing Overview

See side-by-side comparisons of different flame resistant fabrics exposed to flash fires, illustrating the extent, severity and location of burns....More

Newsletter Signup

Connect With Us