advanced search

The Almighty Code

Nov 1, 2004 12:00 PM, By Michael Eby, Editor-in-Chief

With its 50th edition about to hit the streets, the NEC has now seen more revisions than a lot of electrical industry professionals have celebrated birthdays, but it's no less revered or relevant than when it was first published more than 100 years ago. From its humble beginnings in 1897, to becoming the go-to guide for safe electrical installations, the Code has taken on a “higher” significance and developed an almost religious following. Electrical designers, construction personnel, maintenance technicians, and electrical inspectors track its every move and study its nuances ad infinitum. It's as if this material object has some type of attractive power that draws people in and converts them into lifelong acolytes.

And if you need proof, just look around at your colleagues. EC&M readers are as committed as anyone in the industry. I see this each and every time I review the independent reader research data supplied to me by our marketing department. For instance, take a look at some key statistics from our recent research reports.

• 73% read the August and September Code Quandaries department

• 72% read the July Code Basics article, “Don't Get Your Signals Crossed When Installing Radio and TV Equipment”

• 78% subscribe to CodeWatch, EC&M's e-newsletter on the Code

• 74% read the June Code Violations article, “What's Wrong Here?”

• 80% read the April Code Quandaries department

• 4.8 out of 5.0 was the importance rating assigned to the Code by EC&M readers

But it's more than just the numbers. When we asked you what you want to see discussed in the magazine in greater detail, these were just a few of the many Code-related suggestions you gave us:

• “Code issues involving UPSs and gen-sets”

• “Electrical design and how the NEC applies”

• “Expanded viewpoints of NEC code selections”

• “NEC changes for present Code throughout the three-year cycle, as well as up-and-coming Code changes slated for the new Code series”

So as not to disappoint you or keep you from work as a Code disciple, this month's cover story, written by NEC consultant Mike Holt, presents the Top 25 need-to-know revisions of the 2005 NEC (page 44). From added requirements for GFCIs and revised rules for AFCIs to clarified definitions and intent of grounding and bonding requirements, we've got you covered.

In an industry where safety requirements constantly evolve, the measure of its standards is how well they adapt to members' needs. And the true measure of its members is how well they educate themselves on those evolving standards. If you don't choose to get your Code change information from EC&M, get it somewhere. We need as many informed — and safe — installers who worship in the church of the Code as we can get.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!

© 2012 Penton Business Media, Inc.

---

Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus

Browse Back Issues Select an Issue November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 1, 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 1, 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 1, 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 2006 March 1, 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 February 1, 1995 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 December 1, 1996 November 1, 1996 October 1, 1996 September 1, 1996 August 1, 1996 July 1, 1996 June 1, 1996 May 1, 1996 April 1, 1996 March 1, 1996 February 1, 1996 January 1, 1996 December 1, 1995 November 30, 1995 November 1, 1995 October 1, 1995 September 1, 1995 August 1, 1995 July 1, 1995 June 1, 1995 May 1, 1995 April 1, 1995 March 1, 1995

browse e-newsletters