2011 National Electrical Code Changes

25. 690.47 Grounding Electrode System

The requirements for PV grounding electrode systems have been greatly revised.

690.47 Grounding Electrode System.

(B) Direct-Current Systems. If installing a DC system, a grounding electrode system must be provided in accordance with 250.166 with a grounding electrode conductor in accordance with 250.64.

A common DC grounding-electrode conductor is permitted to serve multiple inverters with the size of the common grounding electrode and the tap conductors in accordance with 250.166. The tap conductors must be connected to the common grounding-electrode conductor in such a manner that the common grounding electrode conductor remains without a splice or joint.

(C) Alternating-Current (AC) and Direct-Current (DC) Grounding Requirements. PV systems with DC modules having no direct connection between the DC grounded conductor and AC grounded conductor must be bonded to the AC grounding system by one of the methods listed in (1), (2), or (3).

Note 1: ANSI/UL 1741, Standard for Inverters, Converters, and Controllers for Use in Independent Power Systems have the grounding electrode conductor (GEC) connection point identified. In PV inverters, the terminals for the DC and AC equipment grounding conductors common with each other are marked DC GEC terminal.

Note 2: For utility-interactive systems, the existing premises grounding system serves as the AC grounding system.

(1) Separate DC Grounding Electrode System Bonded to the AC Grounding Electrode System. A separate DC grounding electrode bonded to the AC grounding electrode system with a bonding jumper sized to the larger of the existing AC grounding electrode conductor or DC grounding electrode conductor specified by 250.166.

The DC grounding electrode conductor or bonding jumper to the AC grounding electrode system can’t be used as the required AC equipment grounding conductor.

(2) Common DC and AC Grounding Electrode. A DC grounding electrode conductor sized in accordance with 250.166 run from the marked DC grounding electrode connection point to the AC grounding electrode. (click here to see Fig. 21)

Where an AC grounding electrode isn’t accessible, the DC grounding electrode conductor is permitted to terminate to the AC grounding electrode conductor by irreversible compression-type connectors listed as grounding and bonding equipment or by the exothermic welding process [250.64(C)(1)].

The DC grounding electrode conductor or bonding jumper to the AC grounding electrode system can’t be used as the required AC equipment grounding conductor.

(3) Combined DC Grounding Electrode Conductor and AC Equipment Grounding Conductor. An unspliced, or irreversibly spliced, combined equipment grounding/grounding electrode conductor run from the marked DC grounding electrode connection point along with the AC circuit conductors to the grounding bus bar in the associated AC equipment.

The combined equipment grounding/grounding electrode conductor must be sized to the larger of 250.122 or 250.166 and be installed in accordance with 250.64(E).

Analysis: Section 690.47(B) has been revised to clarify that a common grounding electrode conductor can be used to ground multiple inverters. This concept isn’t new to the Code, as similar provisions can be found in 250.30 for separately derived systems.

As can be seen rather easily, (C) has been extensively revised again. Changes to this edition of the NEC are intended to incorporate the concepts of the 2005 and 2008 editions into clear, easily understandable text.

In a somewhat surprising change, 690.47(D) was deleted. That section required that ground and pole-mounted PV arrays have a grounding electrode. This requirement was added in the 2008 edition and was intended to be optional. The Code language that was used, however, made it mandatory. By removing the rule altogether, it’s still optional, but now isn’t mandatory.

Discuss this Article 18

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

Why change the isolated ground receptacle requirement?the hospitals here have been @ for 40 years now.why did it take so long for the code makers to figure that out? Tr receptacles r too expensive to install,that means people will not hire electricians to replace there receptacles.they will install the traditional type or just not install new ones.I feel imbarrased about being an electrician because of these code rules.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

I think the worst code change is having to add ur own support. To secure wire above a ceiling grid.shouldn't. U also have to support the luminaire as well.in fact,why not just use the support wires that support the grid. Most of the code changes are a waste of time and money.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 25, 2012

Apparently you dont understand!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

I just want to know why it took so long for them to come up with this stuff.we went to the moon in 69 and now they just figured out how to support wire above a ceiling!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 17, 2012

The UL listing for a device that draws current should be what demands the neutral, not the NEC. Hundreds of millions of ordinary switch loops should not have to be saddled with the cost of the relatively few that need a neutral

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 26, 2012

Changes for conduit is it true no more 1/2" conduit can b used.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 31, 2012

Can anyone tell me what code sections are applicable to roof mounted solar systems. Just the changes from 08-2011. What changes will have to be made to roof solar systems per 2011 that weren't applicable in 2008

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 2, 2012

Is there a code requirement for using a GCFI for sump pumps and/or ejectors in basements? Also is it required for clothes washers?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 8, 2012

I heard of a new code stating each and every circuit has to have its own neutral ? no more A,B,C, phase with one nuetral "full Boat"? is this true?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Apr 5, 2013

you can still network if using handle ties or three pole breaker

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 8, 2012

AFCI not work properly in over 50%

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 4, 2013

The fire safety code requires the use of our own grid wires. To make sure lights don't fall out of the ceiling onto the fire fighters head. Sucks but makes sense. If you install a breaker lock on the circuits so they can be switched off at the same time, so there isnt any unbalanced neutral loads so you can work the circuit safely. Again common sense. Most of the code is written to protect people other than electricians.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 19, 2013

Sounds like most people calling themselves "electricians " should probably take a code class to "refresh" what they should already learned about in apprentice class.

Anthony, IAEI Member (not verified)
on Feb 25, 2013

Anyone can become involved in the code change process. There are multiple organizations you can join. Every year thousands of people work hard to try and make the code as good as it can get, and every year we realize it’s not perfect. If you do not try and make a difference you have no right to complain. If you really want to try and make a difference join a group and get involved. Everyone acts like they have no control over these changes. If you sit on the sidelines all your life and just watch you will never be anything more than a spectator!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 14, 2013

Codes are there for a reason.If anyone could understand and apply them properly electricians wouldn't make the $ we make.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 15, 2013

If a home sustained water damages to the electrical box and flooded basement and all floors does the National Code require that all wiring to the entier house be replaced?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 22, 2013

Yes. Any electrical equipment that has been flooded should be replaced.

NEMA has a great document guide for evaluating flood damaged electrical equipment. Here is the link.
http://www.nema.org/Standards/ComplimentaryDocuments/Evaluating-Water-da...

Anonymous (not verified)
on Apr 11, 2013

when do have to change from t12 tubes to t 5 for ballast

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine ID
(optional)

White Papers
EC&M Learning Center
Webinars
EC&M TV
Apr. 15, 2013
video

The Westex Difference

Learn what sets Westex apart from other flame resistant fabric manufacturers....More

Newsletter Signup

Connect With Us