2011 National Electrical Code Changes

14. 310.15 Conductor Ampacity

This section, dealing with the ampacity of conductors, has been extensively revised.

310.15(B) Ampacity Table. The allowable conductor ampacities listed in Table 310.15(B)(16) are based on conditions where the ambient temperature isn’t more than 86°F, and no more than three current-carrying conductors are bundled together.

The temperature correction and adjustment factors apply to the ampacity for the temperature rating of the conductor, provided the corrected and adjusted ampacity doesn’t exceed the ampacity for the temperature rating of the termination in accordance with the provisions of 110.14(C).

(2) Ambient Temperature Correction Factors. When conductors are installed in an ambient temperature other than 78°F to 86°F, the ampacities listed in Table 310.15(B)(16) must be corrected in accordance with the multipliers listed in Table 310.15(B)(2)(a). (click here to see Fig. 14)

(4) Ampacity adjustment factors don’t apply to conductors within Type AC or Type MC cable under the following conditions:

(a) The cables don’t have an outer jacket,

(b) Each cable has no more than three current-carrying conductors,

(c) The conductors are 12 AWG copper, and

(d) No more than 20 current-carrying conductors (ten 2-wire cables or six 3-wire cables) are installed without maintaining spacing for a continuous length longer than 24 in.

(5) Ampacity adjustment of 60% applies to conductors within Type AC or Type MC cable without an overall outer jacket under the following conditions:

(b) The number of current-carrying conductors exceeds 20.

(c) The cables are stacked or bundled longer that measure 24 in. without spacing being maintained.

Analysis: In this edition of the Code, the term “derate(ing)” isn’t used at all, except in a few instances. The term “ampacity adjustment” is used throughout the NEC when referring to conductors that are bundled or used on rooftops, and the term “correction” is used when conductors are subjected to temperatures other than 86°F.

Conductors with insulation temperature ratings higher than the termination’s temperature rating can be used for conductor ampacity adjustment, correction, or both [110.14(C)]. This means conductor ampacity must be based on the conductor’s insulation temperature rating listed in Table 310.15(B)(16), as adjusted for ambient temperature correction factors, conductor bundling adjustment factors, or both. This change clarifies that, after applying these adjustments and corrections, the resulting ampacity still can’t exceed the temperature limitations of the equipment termination.

The temperature correction factors formerly found at the bottom of (then) Table 310.16 in the 2008 NEC, were some of the least user-friendly in the Code. This new table provides a remarkably easier format, with less confusion and proper application being the end result. An interesting addition to this table is borrowed from the Canadian Electrical Code — the allowance of smaller conductors when installed in an ambient temperature of less than 70°F. With this allowance, the NEC user can use up to 115% of the conductor’s ampacity in certain conditions, which can result in a smaller conductor. While previous editions of the Code recognized colder environments, it allowed only for an increase to 104% of the conductor’s ampacity — a value that never really made the math worthwhile.

Previous editions of the NEC used the term “nipple” to describe a raceway that’s 24 in. or less in length. This resulted in Code users debating about the physical characteristics of the raceways, such as whether or not the raceway could contain bends. This change takes away that argument by removing the term “nipple(s)” and replacing it with “raceway(s).” One no longer needs to guess at the intent of this section and now needs only to measure the length and determine the appropriate rules.

The term “bundled” has been used for several Code cycles to describe when ampacity adjustment is required. Because the term isn’t defined in Art. 100, many people struggle in their attempts to determine when to apply the adjustment provisions of this section. While the phrase “installed without maintaining spacing” is also not defined, some NEC users may find it an easier phrase to understand and apply. This change isn’t intended to be a technical one, but rather an editorial one.

New to the 2008 Code came a rule requiring that all conductors installed in conduits on rooftops have their ampacities adjusted dramatically. The term “conduit,” while not defined in the NEC, doesn’t include raceways such as EMT, ENT, and FMT. With this change, conductors installed in these raceways will now have to have their ampacities adjusted as well.

The ampacity of some conductors in Table 310.15(B)(16) (formerly 310.16) didn’t match those found in the Canadian Electrical Code and were therefore changed. While no technical evidence was submitted showing insulation failure of the conductors, this proposal was passed. The end result was a change to the ampacities of:

Copper conductors: 14, 12, 3, and 1 AWG, and 600kcmil, 1,500kcmil and 2,000kcmil.

Aluminum conductors: 12, 8, and 6 AWG, and 300kcmil, 700kcmil, and 800kcmil.

Discuss this Article 18

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

Why change the isolated ground receptacle requirement?the hospitals here have been @ for 40 years now.why did it take so long for the code makers to figure that out? Tr receptacles r too expensive to install,that means people will not hire electricians to replace there receptacles.they will install the traditional type or just not install new ones.I feel imbarrased about being an electrician because of these code rules.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

I think the worst code change is having to add ur own support. To secure wire above a ceiling grid.shouldn't. U also have to support the luminaire as well.in fact,why not just use the support wires that support the grid. Most of the code changes are a waste of time and money.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 25, 2012

Apparently you dont understand!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

I just want to know why it took so long for them to come up with this stuff.we went to the moon in 69 and now they just figured out how to support wire above a ceiling!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 17, 2012

The UL listing for a device that draws current should be what demands the neutral, not the NEC. Hundreds of millions of ordinary switch loops should not have to be saddled with the cost of the relatively few that need a neutral

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 26, 2012

Changes for conduit is it true no more 1/2" conduit can b used.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 31, 2012

Can anyone tell me what code sections are applicable to roof mounted solar systems. Just the changes from 08-2011. What changes will have to be made to roof solar systems per 2011 that weren't applicable in 2008

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 2, 2012

Is there a code requirement for using a GCFI for sump pumps and/or ejectors in basements? Also is it required for clothes washers?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 8, 2012

I heard of a new code stating each and every circuit has to have its own neutral ? no more A,B,C, phase with one nuetral "full Boat"? is this true?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Apr 5, 2013

you can still network if using handle ties or three pole breaker

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 8, 2012

AFCI not work properly in over 50%

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 4, 2013

The fire safety code requires the use of our own grid wires. To make sure lights don't fall out of the ceiling onto the fire fighters head. Sucks but makes sense. If you install a breaker lock on the circuits so they can be switched off at the same time, so there isnt any unbalanced neutral loads so you can work the circuit safely. Again common sense. Most of the code is written to protect people other than electricians.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 19, 2013

Sounds like most people calling themselves "electricians " should probably take a code class to "refresh" what they should already learned about in apprentice class.

Anthony, IAEI Member (not verified)
on Feb 25, 2013

Anyone can become involved in the code change process. There are multiple organizations you can join. Every year thousands of people work hard to try and make the code as good as it can get, and every year we realize it’s not perfect. If you do not try and make a difference you have no right to complain. If you really want to try and make a difference join a group and get involved. Everyone acts like they have no control over these changes. If you sit on the sidelines all your life and just watch you will never be anything more than a spectator!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 14, 2013

Codes are there for a reason.If anyone could understand and apply them properly electricians wouldn't make the $ we make.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 15, 2013

If a home sustained water damages to the electrical box and flooded basement and all floors does the National Code require that all wiring to the entier house be replaced?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 22, 2013

Yes. Any electrical equipment that has been flooded should be replaced.

NEMA has a great document guide for evaluating flood damaged electrical equipment. Here is the link.
http://www.nema.org/Standards/ComplimentaryDocuments/Evaluating-Water-da...

Anonymous (not verified)
on Apr 11, 2013

when do have to change from t12 tubes to t 5 for ballast

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine ID
(optional)

White Papers
EC&M Learning Center
Webinars
EC&M TV
Nov. 24, 2008
video
Electrical Construction and Maintenance

Retrofit 2-Gang TV Box(TM)

Arlington’s recessed two-gang TV BOX™ for old work allows you to mount LCD and plasma TVs, and other system components flush against the wall....More

Newsletter Signup

Connect With Us