2011 National Electrical Code Changes

10. 300.4 Protection Against Physical Damage

This rule has been revised to be more technically accurate.

300.4 Protection Against Physical Damage. Conductors, raceways, and cables must be protected against physical damage [110.27(B)].

Analysis: Previous editions of the NEC have required protection of conductors where subject to physical damage. While most Code users understand this rule is intended to apply to all conductors in all wiring methods, it didn’t clearly state that. This revision makes it clear that all conductors in all wiring methods must be protected from physical damage.

The rule on protecting raceways under metal-corrugated sheet roof decking has been expanded.

300.4(E) Wiring Under Roof Decking. Cables, raceways, and enclosures under metal-corrugated sheet roof decking must not be located within 1½ in. of the roof decking, measured from the lowest surface of the roof decking to the top of the cable, raceway, or box. In addition, cables, raceways, and enclosures aren’t permitted in concealed locations of metal-corrugated sheet decking type roofing.

Ex: Spacing from roof decking doesn’t apply to rigid metal conduit and intermediate metal conduit.

Analysis: New to the 2008 NEC was a requirement for the protection of most raceways when installed within 1½ in. of the roof deck. Although this 2008 rule change went a long way toward protecting wiring systems from damaging roofing screws that can penetrate the raceways, it left out one critical part of the installation — boxes. With this change, it’s clear that the Code is concerned not only with protecting the raceways, but also the boxes.

This rule was also changed to prohibit wiring methods from being installed in concealed locations above the roof decking. In some instances, installers place raceways above the roof deck prior to the insulation being installed, which results in the same potential for damage from roofing screws.

The requirement for protection of conductors 4 AWG and larger has been changed to add clarity.

300.4(G) Insulating Fittings. If raceways contain insulated circuit conductors 4 AWG and larger that enter an enclosure, the conductors must be protected from abrasion during and after installation by a fitting identified to provide a smooth, rounded insulating surface, such as an insulating bushing. (click here to see Fig. 9)

Ex.: Insulating bushings aren’t required if a raceway terminates in a threaded raceway entry that provides a smooth, rounded, or flared surface for the conductors. An example would be a meter hub fitting or a Meyer’s hub-type fitting.

Analysis: The term “substantial fitting” has been replaced with the term “identified” so that inspectors won’t have to interpret the Code unnecessarily. The term “identified” is clearly defined in Art. 100, is used throughout the NEC, and takes interpretation out of the requirement. Although fittings that are designed to provide this protection are typically used to achieve compliance with this requirement, it could have been argued that fittings designed for another application could satisfy this rule. This change removes that argument by making the NEC a more prescriptive document.

A new protection requirement for structural (expansion) joints was added.

300.4(H) Structural Joints. A listed expansion/deflection fitting or other approved means must be used where a raceway crosses a structural joint intended for expansion, contraction or deflection.

Analysis: In larger commercial/industrial buildings, it isn’t uncommon to see an expansion joint inside of the building. When these are encountered, the Code has never offered any guidance to the installer as it pertains to wiring methods. With this change, it becomes clear that a fitting or other approved means must be used to allow for expansion or deflection of the wiring method.

Discuss this Article 18

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

Why change the isolated ground receptacle requirement?the hospitals here have been @ for 40 years now.why did it take so long for the code makers to figure that out? Tr receptacles r too expensive to install,that means people will not hire electricians to replace there receptacles.they will install the traditional type or just not install new ones.I feel imbarrased about being an electrician because of these code rules.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

I think the worst code change is having to add ur own support. To secure wire above a ceiling grid.shouldn't. U also have to support the luminaire as well.in fact,why not just use the support wires that support the grid. Most of the code changes are a waste of time and money.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 25, 2012

Apparently you dont understand!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

I just want to know why it took so long for them to come up with this stuff.we went to the moon in 69 and now they just figured out how to support wire above a ceiling!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 17, 2012

The UL listing for a device that draws current should be what demands the neutral, not the NEC. Hundreds of millions of ordinary switch loops should not have to be saddled with the cost of the relatively few that need a neutral

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 26, 2012

Changes for conduit is it true no more 1/2" conduit can b used.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 31, 2012

Can anyone tell me what code sections are applicable to roof mounted solar systems. Just the changes from 08-2011. What changes will have to be made to roof solar systems per 2011 that weren't applicable in 2008

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 2, 2012

Is there a code requirement for using a GCFI for sump pumps and/or ejectors in basements? Also is it required for clothes washers?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 8, 2012

I heard of a new code stating each and every circuit has to have its own neutral ? no more A,B,C, phase with one nuetral "full Boat"? is this true?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Apr 5, 2013

you can still network if using handle ties or three pole breaker

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 8, 2012

AFCI not work properly in over 50%

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 4, 2013

The fire safety code requires the use of our own grid wires. To make sure lights don't fall out of the ceiling onto the fire fighters head. Sucks but makes sense. If you install a breaker lock on the circuits so they can be switched off at the same time, so there isnt any unbalanced neutral loads so you can work the circuit safely. Again common sense. Most of the code is written to protect people other than electricians.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 19, 2013

Sounds like most people calling themselves "electricians " should probably take a code class to "refresh" what they should already learned about in apprentice class.

Anthony, IAEI Member (not verified)
on Feb 25, 2013

Anyone can become involved in the code change process. There are multiple organizations you can join. Every year thousands of people work hard to try and make the code as good as it can get, and every year we realize it’s not perfect. If you do not try and make a difference you have no right to complain. If you really want to try and make a difference join a group and get involved. Everyone acts like they have no control over these changes. If you sit on the sidelines all your life and just watch you will never be anything more than a spectator!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 14, 2013

Codes are there for a reason.If anyone could understand and apply them properly electricians wouldn't make the $ we make.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 15, 2013

If a home sustained water damages to the electrical box and flooded basement and all floors does the National Code require that all wiring to the entier house be replaced?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 22, 2013

Yes. Any electrical equipment that has been flooded should be replaced.

NEMA has a great document guide for evaluating flood damaged electrical equipment. Here is the link.
http://www.nema.org/Standards/ComplimentaryDocuments/Evaluating-Water-da...

Anonymous (not verified)
on Apr 11, 2013

when do have to change from t12 tubes to t 5 for ballast

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine ID
(optional)

White Papers
EC&M Learning Center
Webinars
EC&M TV
Jan. 27, 2010
video
Electrical Construction and Maintenance

Arlington CED1 Entrance Hoods

The Scoop Series CED Entrance Plates and Hoods are reversible, non-metallic, single and two-gang versions...More

Newsletter Signup

Connect With Us