advanced search

A View From the Top

Sep 1, 2004 12:00 PM, By Michael Eby, Editor-in-Chief

I guess it should come as no surprise that the average sales growth rate from 2002 to 2003 for EC&M's Top 50 Electrical Contractors was just barely in the black (1.4%). Many of these top tier firms projected a leveling off period in last year's survey. This view of stabilization was also shared by most of the economic pundits in the construction industry. But even though the average was a move in the right direction, there were still some pretty wild swings among this elite group.

Four of the five firms posting the biggest percentage gains in this year's survey come from the lower portion of the listing. Lake Erie Electric, Westlake, Ohio, (ranked 39th on the list) led the charge this year by posting a whopping 37.5% year-to-year gain in sales. They attributed their impressive growth to improved economic conditions in the Ohio area.

O'Connell Electric, Victor, N.Y., (49th) and Mona Electric Group, Clinton, Md., (48th) posted almost equally as impressive gains of 26.4% and 26.2%, respectively. Mona Electric contributed their success to the awarding of several larger construction projects and more diligent marketing efforts, which helps support the theory that there's no better time to increase your marketing efforts than in difficult times.

Interestingly enough, all three of these firms dropped off our 2003 listing, but made the cut once again based on their strong showing in 2003.

Cleveland Electric Co., Atlanta, (42nd) and Morrow-Meadows Corp., City of Industry, Calif., (15th) round out the five firms with the largest percentage increase in sales from 2002 to 2003. Cleveland Electric posted the fourth largest gain at 23%, followed closely behind by Morrows-Meadows at 22.4%. Morrow-Meadows is another firm that seems to be in the right place at the right time. They attributed their strong growth rate to a hot California construction market, especially the health-care segment.

But as with most things in life, you must take the good news with the bad. If the overall average was a mere 1.4%, then you know some other firms on the listing had a year they'd soon like to forget.

Tri-City Electrical Contractors, Altamonte Springs, Fla., (31st) took the biggest hit in the group, posting a 26.6% drop in sales from the prior year. Tri-City is working on reclaiming its identify as a stand-alone company, after having been acquired a few years ago by Encompass Services Corp. (which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in October 2002) and more recently purchased back by its original owner. In the midst of this ping-pong action, the company lost its bonding, which left it with the inability to procure work. As you might imagine, growing a business under these circumstances is nearly impossible.

Guarantee Electrical, St. Louis (34th), Henkels & McCoy, Blue Bell, Pa. (4th), The Newtron Group, Baton Rouge, La. (29th), and Cache Valley Electric, Logan, Utah (41st) round out the five firms that suffered the largest percentage drop in sales — each posting a decline in the mid-teens range. The declines can be explained in part by looking at the type of work these firms perform.

Guarantee noted that more than 50% of its work is commercial in nature. Henkels & McCoy has a large presence in the electric utility market. The Newtron Group specializes in industrial construction. And roughly one-third of Cache Valley's work is in the industrial sector. As we all know, each of these market segments has suffered mightily in recent years.

So what does the future hold for the biggest players in the electrical construction industry? Many were cautiously optimistic in their forecast for 2004 and 2005. But if you ask me, I think the worst is over. I guess next year's survey will prove me right or wrong.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!

© 2012 Penton Business Media, Inc.

---

Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus

Browse Back Issues Select an Issue EC&M Magazine | April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 1, 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 1, 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 1, 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 2006 March 1, 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 February 1, 1995 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 December 1, 1996 November 1, 1996 October 1, 1996 September 1, 1996 August 1, 1996 July 1, 1996 June 1, 1996 May 1, 1996 April 1, 1996 March 1, 1996 February 1, 1996 January 1, 1996 December 1, 1995 November 30, 1995 November 1, 1995 October 1, 1995 September 1, 1995 August 1, 1995 July 1, 1995 June 1, 1995 May 1, 1995 April 1, 1995 March 1, 1995

browse e-newsletters