advanced search

The Rarity of Common Sense

Jun 1, 2002 12:00 PM, By John DeDad, Editorial Director

Graduating with rosy visions of success and satisfaction, young electrical power engineers — what few there are — will enter an industry that is short on pizzazz and long on mundane and mature technologies. It hasn't been that long since we first saw solid-state construction in many of the products typically specified by electrical engineers. Microprocessor control is even newer.

These engineers will enter an industry where consulting electrical engineering is considered a commodity, a price-sensitive service in the minds of many architects and owners. As supervisors to this new breed, many veteran engineers will ask, Why enter an industry in which you're asked to do more for less, while being buffeted by criticism from contractors for the quality of your working drawings and from architects and owners for cost overruns, extras, and claim litigation?

But the biggest problem will be the young engineers' lack of what I like to call “construction common sense.” Sure, they'll have all the required technical knowledge and be comfortable with Fourier series equations, Laplace transforms, and calculus. In fact, they'll probably be able to take the Fundamentals of Engineering and Professional Engineering exams right after graduation and pass with flying colors. But what they won't know is what's involved in electrical construction: the types of boxes for specific wall constructions, for example; or maximum wire sizes that you can physically pull, insert, and/or terminate; or even how to size motor feeder conductors.

Consider these examples of the current lack of construction common sense.

• A young engineer working as a consultant for a major industrial client was concerned about voltage drop on an isolated ground (IG) conductor, so he specified that a 6 AWG conductor be run from the service grounding electrode and terminated at an IG receptacle. I still wonder how the installing electrician was able to bend the conductor into a small enough loop, let alone get it under the device's IG screw.

• While working for a municipal agency, another young engineer had the task of designing the electrical portion for a low-income, multiple-unit housing project. His design included some hefty feeders uncharacteristic of multifamily residential occupancies; fractional horsepower rooftop fans had 6 AWG and 4 AWG feeders. In a telephone discussion, he told me he sized the conductors for the starting current of each motor. The tone of his voice implied this was a commonly recognized design practice.

• Still another young engineer recently hired by a national department store chain went to a new store to inspect the electrical installation and make sure the contractor and local utility were in agreement as to the configuration of the service tie-in. Parallel 750kcmil copper conductors ran from the store's main switchboard to the utility's pad mount transformer. The engineer brought his own clamp-on ammeter to measure phase current and clamped it around each conductor of the parallel conductors for each phase, adding the readings to get the current on the specific phase. He concluded that some conductors were overloaded. I tried explaining that to get accurate current readings he should use a large, jointed CT accessory that could fit around all the parallel conductors of a phase. After a heated argument, we contacted the manufacturer of his clamp-on, who finally convinced the engineer he needed the accessory.

Granted, these are extreme cases and certainly not the norm. But no matter how academically talented our young graduates may be, they will one day encounter problems they didn't read about in a book. The solution involves getting these young and eager people onto jobsites as frequently as possible to increase their practical knowledge and enhance their capabilities.

What do you think? E-mail me with your comments.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!

© 2012 Penton Business Media, Inc.

---

Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus

Browse Back Issues Select an Issue EC&M Magazine | April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 1, 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 1, 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 1, 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 2006 March 1, 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 February 1, 1995 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 December 1, 1996 November 1, 1996 October 1, 1996 September 1, 1996 August 1, 1996 July 1, 1996 June 1, 1996 May 1, 1996 April 1, 1996 March 1, 1996 February 1, 1996 January 1, 1996 December 1, 1995 November 30, 1995 November 1, 1995 October 1, 1995 September 1, 1995 August 1, 1995 July 1, 1995 June 1, 1995 May 1, 1995 April 1, 1995 March 1, 1995

browse e-newsletters