advanced search

AFCI Article Sparks Reader Debate

Jan 1, 2008 12:00 PM

Your magazine is very informative. I would like to comment on the article by Gerald Winstanley from NEMA, starting on page C34 of the November 2007 issue. The article on arc fault detectors talks about the increased cost of using these breakers. The only increased cost the author cites is arc fault breakers vs. regular breakers.

It seems he forgot that when you install these AFCI breakers you can no longer use a circuit with a common neutral to feed two circuits with one wire (14-3/12-3). So now you have to run a separate 14-2 or 12-2 for each circuit. With the cost of copper being so high, this significantly raises the cost of the job. Of course, increased labor costs are also incurred, because you now have to pull two wires instead of one.

The author also seemed to blow off nuisance tripping. Perhaps he should have consulted people who actually work in the field. We're the guinea pigs for these new devices and have to pay the price with increased callbacks, such as when a customer is upset because the vacuum cleaner keeps tripping the AFCI.
— Randy Gartner, owner, Randy Gartner Sound, Lighting and Electric, Robesonia, Pa.

Author's response: We appreciate the response from Mr. Gartner. The issue of using a multi-wire branch circuit is a specific wiring practice that is neither required nor prohibited by the National Electrical Code. It's important to point out that this method of wiring branch circuits may be common in limited areas of the country, but is not the most prevalent method of wiring. Where this wiring practice is used, at least one manufacturer has delivered a product to help alleviate the concern about “additional labor” and associated costs through introduction of a 4-wire NM cable that accommodates two separate branch circuits with separate neutrals.

In doing comprehensive reviews of “nuisance trip” claims, it has been found that the most prevalent cause of unwanted tripping is problematic wiring practices that have turned out to be somewhat commonplace. AFCIs detect wiring errors such as crossed neutrals as well as neutrals that have unintentionally made contact with an equipment-grounding conductor — not an uncommon occurrence if the installer is not careful in pushing the switch or receptacle back into a box.

These were generally not detected on circuits without AFCIs, so they are now seen as a “nuisance” because the AFCI has uncovered the wiring error. Manufacturers have been thorough in their follow-up investigations of “nuisance claims.” What is often found is that when pursued for details, the claim is suddenly no longer a concern or the issue is resolved. Without solid details, many of these arguments have no substantiation other than pass-along rumors.

To address this concern and to gather useful realistic data, NEMA is offering a new “Unwanted Tripping Report” feature on its Web site (www.afcisafety.org) to log these issues and ask questions to help the manufacturers investigate issues — whether product or installation based. The NEMA AFCI manufacturers do want to identify legitimate issues and provide solutions — to the contractors and homeowners. Logged reports on the system will be forwarded to the specific product manufacturer, and a follow-up call will result to further investigate inquiries to derive a satisfactory solution. A secondary benefit will be the ability to uncover potential electronic product or installation patterns that cause repeated issues by tracking the results in aggregate.

The AFCI manufacturers intend to further document and substantiate actual claims to reduce the “opinion” vs. “fact” issues that seem to be rampant about this new life and property-saving technology. I encourage contractors to use this resource to mutually drive residential electrical safety.
— Gerard Winstanley, technical program manager with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association's Low-Voltage Distribution Equipment section, Rosslyn, Va.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!

© 2012 Penton Business Media, Inc.

---

Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus

Browse Back Issues Select an Issue EC&M Magazine | April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 1, 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 1, 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 1, 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 2006 March 1, 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 February 1, 1995 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 December 1, 1996 November 1, 1996 October 1, 1996 September 1, 1996 August 1, 1996 July 1, 1996 June 1, 1996 May 1, 1996 April 1, 1996 March 1, 1996 February 1, 1996 January 1, 1996 December 1, 1995 November 30, 1995 November 1, 1995 October 1, 1995 September 1, 1995 August 1, 1995 July 1, 1995 June 1, 1995 May 1, 1995 April 1, 1995 March 1, 1995

browse e-newsletters