What Lamps Will Be Phased Out?

What is in this article?:

Lighting industry experts discuss the new standards for lamp efficiency

Sidebar No. 1: The Truth About the Bulb "Ban"

Political hopefuls have based speeches surrounding the issue, and major news outlets have written stories about interior designers’ and restaurateurs’ plans for hoarding, but the National Lighting Bureau (NLB), the Silver Spring, Md.-based independent, not-for-profit, lighting information source, urges the lighting community to set the record straight. Contrary to popular belief, incandescent lamps have not been banned. “People are not being given good information about lighting,” says NLB’s Executive Director John Bachner, who blames poor media coverage for the confusion about the phaseout of 100W, 75W, 60W, and 40W incandescent lamps from the national inventory. “Incandescent lighting is not being eliminated or outlawed,” he emphasizes.

According to NLB, only the least-efficient, commonly used versions for which far more efficient and cost-effective alternatives are available, including incandescent alternatives, are being eliminated. “As long as people pick the right bulb for the result they want, in terms of lighting quality and dimmability, for example, the alternatives available right now can do everything positive that incandescent lamps do while costing much less, consuming far less energy, and contributing far less to our greenhouse-gas and air-borne mercury problems,” Bachner states.

The controversy stems from the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), which contained maximum wattage standards for all general-service incandescent lamps product from 310 to 2,600 lumens. The original time line for these standards was to begin January 2012, but the final 2012 budget legislation, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in December 2011, effectively delayed the start until October 2012.

At that time, wattages for 100W bulbs are required to drop by 27%, meaning a former 100W bulb will use only 72W of power, yet emit a comparable amount of light. The law will be phased in over the next several years, affecting 75W lamps in 2013 and 60W and 40W lamps in 2014.

With only improved efficiency on the line, Bachner urges the lighting community to speak up about the new standards. “Share your knowledge,” he says. “Educate people. The new lighting-efficiency targets require people to give up nothing in terms of lighting quality, convenience, and versatility. The only thing they really require people to do is decide about the kind of lamp they want to use and how much money they want to save. That’s not a bad thing.”

 

Discuss this Article 2

Lighthouse (not verified)
on Aug 21, 2012

Re: ' The Truth About the Bulb "Ban" '

Not allowing bulbs that don't meet a certain standard is of course the same as banning them,
and John Bachner, like others, also ignores phase 2 of EISA starting after 2014, which with a 45 lumen per Watt regulation also effectively bans the touted 72W Halogen type replacements.
His notion seems to be of a Free Lunch, that reducing the allowed energy use of a given product does not impact on other features like performance, construction, appearance etc apart from price

More desirable lamps arise from increasing - not decreasing - competition!
New energy saving lamps can always be helped to market to increase choice and competition, albeit not continuously subsidised

The whole rationale for energy savings can be questioned:
Token c. 1% of grid energy on DoE's own data, supported by EU and UK-Cambridge data, and still not counting life cycle energy use.
Besides, the main off-peak post 7pm usage means little extra coal or similar base loading power is saved, that would not have been burned anyway, for operational reasons (limited reduction even with cycling plants given the problems, APTECH referenced)

A fuller answer may be found at
http://tonn.ie/p/deception-behind-banning-light-bulbs.html
"How Bans are Wrongly Justified"
13 points, referenced

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 19, 2012

Not to mention that in northern climates, additional electric resistance heat may be needed or used more often to offset the loss of heat from the lower efficency lighting. Florida is a different story but for people in Montana, they deserve to be able to buy the old lamps.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine ID
(optional)

White Papers
EC&M Learning Center
Webinars
EC&M TV
Apr. 15, 2013
video

Protection From Arc Flashes

Learn how arc flashes happen, how they are measured and how wearing the right flame resistant clothing can keep workers safe....More

Newsletter Signup

Connect With Us