advanced search

Poor Equipment Placement Can Have Disastrous Consequences

Jun 1, 2003 12:00 PM, By Alexander Kusko, Sc.D, P.E., Exponent Failure Analysis Associates

When it comes to the placement of high-voltage fuses, it's all about location, location, location

Sometimes it's not enough to make sure the equipment you're working on or near has been de-energized. Being aware of your surroundings and the hazards that nearby equipment can present is equally important. But even the most cautious worker can't always be held responsible for his injuries when poor equipment placement is the real culprit.

As an employee of a waste-disposal company prepared to drain oil from the tanks of three de-energized circuit breakers in a 3,000kW outdoor rectifier substation that served an electrified railroad system in New York, he never gave the fused disconnect switch above his head a second thought. That is until the fuse blew open and dumped arc byproducts on him as he was arranging his oil draining equipment. The arc products were blown out of the lower end of the vertically mounted fuse. And although the breakers on which he was working had been disconnected from their source, the switches and bus work in the vicinity of the breakers had not been de-energized.

The substation at the train station is served by two overhead 33kV power lines. The voltage is stepped down to 750VDC inside the substation, which serves the third rails of the railroad. As shown in the Figure above, the 3-phase oil-filled circuit breaker on the primary side of the rectifier transformer had been replaced with three high-voltage pull fuses prior to the accident. The electrical team at the station had left the 750V rectifier DC breaker behind to protect the rectifier from third-rail faults.

As originally installed, the de-energized circuit breaker was located directly under the common 33kV bus and the primary terminal bushings of the rectifier transformer. The 33kV power could have been shut off by the manual switches mounted at the top of the substation structure or at the utility substation feeding the 33kV lines to the substation.

The breakers were removed as part of an upgrade process, thus altering the arrangement of the equipment in the substation. The two 33kV lines terminate at the top of the structure. The substation is normally supplied by one 33kV line; the other line is the alternate. The selection is made by the switches shown in the Figure. The worker was located at the position designated A in the Figure. The transformer supplied the rectifier mounted in the building at the opposite end of the substation. The mountings and contacts for the high-voltage fuses are shown in the Photo at left. The fused disconnects were mounted vertically. They swing down around the lower contacts when they blow or are pulled.

As it turned out, the utility company's records indicated that the circuit breaker at the utility substation that supplied the 33kV line to the railroad substation tripped and reclosed due to a fault. Inrush current to the rectifier transformer when the utility circuit breaker reclosed probably caused the fuse to blow.

For safety reasons and to ensure compliance with the Code, the train station's maintenance crew relocated the high-voltage fused disconnect switches to a horizontal position to prevent future arc products from discharging and showering a person in the substation as happened in this situation.

Although workers in all trades and professions are often warned not to work on or around energized equipment, the railroad shouldn't have permitted the worker to drain the oil from the circuit breakers with the substation energized. The circuit breakers may have been disconnected, but that didn't eliminate all potential for harm. The manual 33kV switches should have been opened, and the DC breaker to the third rails should have been flipped.

The worker was absolved of responsibility and the suit against the railroad was settled before trial, but the case still illustrates the point that no matter how safe you think you are, you always need to be aware of your surroundings.

Kusko is vice president of Exponent Failure Analysis Associates, Natick, Mass.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!

© 2012 Penton Business Media, Inc.

---

Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus

Browse Back Issues Select an Issue EC&M Magazine | April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 1, 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 1, 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 1, 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 2006 March 1, 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 February 1, 1995 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 December 1, 1996 November 1, 1996 October 1, 1996 September 1, 1996 August 1, 1996 July 1, 1996 June 1, 1996 May 1, 1996 April 1, 1996 March 1, 1996 February 1, 1996 January 1, 1996 December 1, 1995 November 30, 1995 November 1, 1995 October 1, 1995 September 1, 1995 August 1, 1995 July 1, 1995 June 1, 1995 May 1, 1995 April 1, 1995 March 1, 1995

browse e-newsletters