Ecmweb 3141 202ecm30pic1
Ecmweb 3141 202ecm30pic1
Ecmweb 3141 202ecm30pic1
Ecmweb 3141 202ecm30pic1
Ecmweb 3141 202ecm30pic1

Code Violations Illustrated

Feb. 1, 2002
As usual, never consider the following commentary associated with these photos as a formal interpretation of the National Electrical Code (NEC). Without criticizing anyone or any product, the following scenarios present us with serious electrical safety questions. Call of the Wild Electrical/mechanical engineer Michael L. Stoianoff, P.E., found this 200A panelboard serving a residential property in

As usual, never consider the following commentary associated with these photos as a formal interpretation of the National Electrical Code (NEC). Without criticizing anyone or any product, the following scenarios present us with serious electrical safety questions.

Call of the Wild

Electrical/mechanical engineer Michael L. Stoianoff, P.E., found this 200A panelboard serving a residential property in rural Alaska. Although it was too faded to read, an approved electrical inspection sticker was affixed to the panelboard. However, there were no circuit directory markings anywhere. In the case of a panelboard, the Code requires all circuits and circuit modifications to be legibly marked by means of a circuit directory located on the panelboard's face, or inside its door. This installation violates 110.22 and 408.4 of the 2002 NEC.

The smaller photo shows receptacles installed directly below for an unknown purpose. Interestingly, the circuit breakers were mounted behind the receptacle boxes. Apparently the conductors were run in a channel cut into the building's wood exterior. There were nine circuit breakers in all, two of which were rated 100A and one 50A. This installation violates Art. 230 and 408, Part III of the 2002 NEC.

Stoianoff also discovered that although the nonmetallic sheathed cable equipment grounding conductors in the branch circuits were pulled into every outlet box, none of them was properly connected or terminated to the equipment grounding terminal on the devices. They were, however, connected to the equipment grounding terminal bus in each panelboard. This wiring arrangement wreaked havoc on the owner's computer. This installation violates 250.148 and 408.20 of the 2002 NEC.

Not Approved for Wet Conditions

These soda machines are located in a wet area on the platform of a train station in North Quincy, Mass. Sec. 406.8(B), which covers 15A and 20A outdoor receptacles installed in a wet location, requires these devices to have a weatherproof enclosure, whether or not the attachment plug cap is inserted.

Any receptacle installed in a wet location and powering an unsupervised piece of equipment, such as a sprinkler system controller, landscape lighting, or holiday lights, must have an enclosure that is weatherproof whether the attachment plug cap is inserted or removed. Also, a receptacle installed in a wet location and powering an unsupervised piece of equipment, such as portable tools, must have an enclosure that is weatherproof when the attachment plug is removed.

Now you can send Code Violations Illustrated stories and photos directly to Joe Tedesco at:
Joe Tedesco
350 North Street
Boston, MA 02113
or e-mail:
[email protected]

If you mail pictures, please include the story, location, and some information about yourself — and please do not write on the front or back of your photo. Please send all digital images in JPEG format. You can send photos while visiting Joe's Web site at: www.joetedesco.com

About the Author

Joe Tedesco

Tedesco served the industry in many roles during his career. He was a director, senior electrical code instructor for National Technology Transfer, Inc. and American Trainco, Inc.. He was also a codes, standards and seminar specialist for the International Association of Electrical Inspectors and an electrical field service specialist for the National Fire Protection Association in Quincy, Mass. He ran his own business as an NEC consultant and is a Massachusetts licensed master electrician and journeyman electrician and certified electrical inspector (one and two family 2A; General 2B, and Plan Review, 2C). Tedesco also wrote articles for CEE News and EC&M (Code Violations Illustrated and What's Wrong Here?) for more than 15 years and helped launched the Moving Violations video series.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Electrical Conduit Comparison Chart

CHAMPION FIBERGLASS electrical conduit is a lightweight, durable option that provides lasting savings when compared to other materials. Compare electrical conduit types including...

Fiberglass Electrical Conduit Chemical Resistance Chart

This information is provided solely as a guide since it is impossible to anticipate all individual site conditions. For specific applications which are not covered in this guide...

Considerations for Direct Burial Conduit

Installation type plays a key role in the type of conduit selected for electrical systems in industrial construction projects. Above ground, below ground, direct buried, encased...

How to Calculate Labor Costs

Most important to accurately estimating labor costs is knowing the approximate hours required for project completion. Learn how to calculate electrical labor cost.